Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31702953›Full record

ArticleCBE life sciences education2019

Using a Reconciliation Module Leads to Large Gains in Evolution Acceptance.

John Lindsay, Adhieu Arok, Seth M Bybee, Walter Cho, April Maskiewicz Cordero, Daniel G Ferguson, Leontine L Galante, Richard Gill, Mark Mann, Steven L Peck and 7 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CBE life sciences education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
37.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

John LindsayDepartment of Biology, Monte L. Bean Museum.
Adhieu ArokDepartment of Biology, Monte L. Bean Museum.
Seth M BybeeDepartment of Biology, Monte L. Bean Museum.
Walter ChoDepartment of Biology, Point Loma Nazarene University, San Diego, CA 92106.
April Maskiewicz CorderoDepartment of Biology, Point Loma Nazarene University, San Diego, CA 92106.
Daniel G FergusonDepartment of Biology, Monte L. Bean Museum.
Leontine L GalanteSchool of Science and Engineering, Colorado Christian University, Lakewood, CO 80226.
Richard GillDepartment of Biology, Monte L. Bean Museum.
Mark MannSchool of Theology and Christian Ministry, Point Loma Nazarene University, San Diego, CA 92106.
Steven L PeckDepartment of Biology, Monte L. Bean Museum.
Cassidy L ShivelyDepartment of Biology, Monte L. Bean Museum.
Michael R StarkDepartment of Physiology and Developmental Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602.
Joshua A StowersDepartment of Biology, Monte L. Bean Museum.
Michael TennesonDepartment of Natural and Applied Sciences, Evangel University, Springfield, MO 65802.
Ethan R Tolman**Department of Plant and Wildlife Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602.
Thomas WaymentComparative Arts and Letters, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602.
Jamie L JensenDepartment of Biology, Monte L. Bean Museum.
Brigham Young University · USPoint Loma Nazarene University · USColorado Christian University · USEvangel University · USPlanta · RU

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Too many students reject the theory of evolution because they view it as incompatible with their religious beliefs. Some have argued that abandoning religious belief is the only way to help religious individuals accept evolution. Conversely, our data support that highlighting faith/evolution compatibility is an effective means to increase student acceptance. We surveyed students enrolled in entry-level biology courses at four religiously affiliated institutions. At each university, teachers gave students a presentation that demonstrated potential compatibility between evolution and faith within the teachings of each university's respective religious affiliation. Students were asked to evaluate their own beliefs about evolution both before and after this instruction. After instruction at each university, students showed significant gains in evolution acceptance without abandoning their religious beliefs. These results demonstrate that giving religious students the opportunity to reconcile their religious beliefs with the theory of evolution under the influence of intentional instruction on the compatibility of belief and evolution can lead to increased evolution acceptance among religious students.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionBiologyHumansRegression AnalysisReligionStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversities

Identifiers

PMID31702953
PMCPMC8727060
OpenAlexW2983235721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.