ArticleJAMA network open2019
Appropriateness of Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Practices in Australia.
Article in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Inappropriate antibiotic prescribing in Ethiopian hospitals: a systematic review.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Embedding locally tailored antimicrobial prophylaxis into standardized order sets for urological procedures reduces antimicrobial use.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026Article
- Appropriateness of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in Spanish hospitals: a national multicentre cross-sectional study.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Article
- Patterns of Surgical Prophylaxis Prescribing for Dentoalveolar Procedures in Australian Hospitals: 2016-2022.Australian dental journal · 2026Article
- Article
- Use of intravenous antibiotics for the management of suspected chorioamnionitis: insights from women's wellness and research center.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2026Article
- Microalgae, Cell Factories for Antimicrobial Peptides: A Promising Response to Antibiotic Resistance.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The Impact of Antibiotic Prophylaxis on Antibiotic Resistance, Clinical Outcomes, and Costs in Adult Hemato-Oncological and Surgical Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Proteomic Insights into Bacterial Responses to Antibiotics: A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Article
- Preventing Surgical Site Infections in the Era of Escalating Antibiotic Resistance and Antibiotic Stewardship.JAMA surgery · 2024Review
- Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis: A Proposal for a Global Evidence-Based Bundle.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Article
- Assessment of antimicrobial prescribing patterns, guidelines compliance, and appropriateness of antimicrobial prescribing in surgical-practice units: point prevalence survey in Malaysian teaching hospitals.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Effect of an E-Prescription Intervention on the Adherence to Surgical Chemoprophylaxis Duration in Cardiac Surgery: A Single Centre Experience.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Association between duration of antimicrobial prophylaxis and postoperative outcomes after lumbar spine surgery.Infection control and hospital epidemiology · 2022Article
- Incidence, Clinical Features, and Association with Prognosis of Bloodstream Infection in Pediatric Patients After Percutaneous or Surgical Treatment for Ventricular Septal Defect or Atrial Septal Defect: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2022Article
- Carbapenem-Resistant Organisms Isolated in Surgical Site Infections in Benin: A Public Health Problem.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) is a common indication for antibiotic use in hospitals and is associated with high rates of inappropriateness. Objective: To describe the SAP prescribing practices and assess hospital, surgical, and patient factors associated with appropriate SAP prescribing. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter, national, quality improvement study with retrospective analysis of data collected from Australian hospitals via Surgical National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey audits from January 1, 2016, to June 30, 2018. Data were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. Crude estimates of appropriateness were adjusted for factors included in the model by calculating estimated marginal means and presented as adjusted-appropriateness with 95% confidence intervals. Main Outcomes and Measures: Adjusted appropriateness and factors associated with inappropriate prescriptions. Results: A total of 9351 surgical episodes and 15 395 prescriptions (10 740 procedural and 4655 postprocedural) were analyzed. Crude appropriateness of total prescriptions was 48.7% (7492 prescriptions). The adjusted appropriateness of each surgical procedure group was low for procedural SAP, ranging from 33.7% (95% CI, 26.3%-41.2%) for dentoalveolar surgery to 68.9% (95% CI, 63.2%-74.5%) for neurosurgery. The adjusted appropriateness of postprocedural prescriptions was also low, ranging from 21.5% (95% CI, 13.4%-29.7%) for breast surgery to 58.7% (95% CI, 47.9%-69.4%) for ophthalmological procedures. The most common reason for inappropriate procedural SAP was incorrect timing (44.9%), while duration greater than 24 hours was the most common reason for inappropriate postprocedural SAP (54.3%). Conclusions and Relevance: High rates of inappropriate procedural and postprocedural antimicrobial use were demonstrated across all surgical specialties. Reasons for inappropriateness, such as timing and duration, varied according to the type of SAP and surgical specialty. These findings highlight the need for improvement in SAP prescribing and suggest potential targeted areas for action.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.