Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31702609›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2019

Prognostic significance of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in patients with ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Xinming Yin, Ling Wu, Hui Yang, HongBo Yang

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xinming YinDepartment of Gynaecology, Zhengjiang 4th Hospital of JiangSu Province, Zhengjiang.
Ling WuHuaian Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital of JiangSu Province, Huaian, China.
Hui YangHuaian Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital of JiangSu Province, Huaian, China.
HongBo YangHuaian Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital of JiangSu Province, Huaian, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prognostic role of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in patients with ovarian cancer remains inconsistent. This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the predictive value of this biomarker for prognoses in ovarian cancer patients.We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase for eligible studies embracing multivariate results. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were used to assess the study quality. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.Ten studies involving 2919 patients were included in this meta-analysis. In multivariate analysis, the group with higher NLR had worse overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.16-1.54) and shorter PFS (HR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.17-1.57) than the control group. Furthermore, PLR values higher than the cut-off were associated with not only poorer OS (HR = 1.97, 95% CI = 1.61-2.40) but also more unfavorable PFS (HR = 1.79, 95% CI = 1.46-2.20). Univariate analysis also indicated the same results. Additionally, subgroup analysis showed that when the cut-off values for NLR and PLR were higher, their predictive effects became stronger.This comprehensive meta-analysis suggested that the values of inflammatory marker of NLR was associated with ovarian cancer survival. Therefore, inflammatory markers can potentially serve as prognostic biomarkers.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansLymphocyte CountNeutrophilsObservational Studies as TopicOvarian NeoplasmsPrognosisSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID31702609
PMCPMC6855616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.