Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31702549›Full record

ArticleCanadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada2020

Gender disparity within academic Canadian urology.

Julius Ilin, Emilie Langlois, Sabeena Jalal, Faisal Khosa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Authorship trends in urology literature A bibliometric analysis by gender.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2026
    Article
  2. Identifying factors influencing specialty choice in urology by female medical students.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2026
    Article
  3. Change is on the horizon.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2025
    Article
  4. Gender differences in authorship of Canadian Urological Association guidelines.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Gender disparity within the Canadian Urological Association A comparison with the Quebec Urological Association.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2024
    Article
  7. Gender disparity on editorial boards of major urology journals.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Continued gender disparity in urology? Only time will tell.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julius IlinFaculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Emilie LangloisFaculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Sabeena JalalDepartment of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Faisal KhosaDepartment of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIncreasing female matriculation into medical school has shown an increase in women training in academic urology, but gender disparity still exists within this male-dominated field. This study aims to evaluate publication productivity and rank differences of Canadian female and male academic urologists.

methodsThe Canadian Residency Matching Service (CaRMS) was used to compile a list of 12 Canadian accredited urology programs. Using each institution's website, faculty members' names, genders, academic positions, and leadership ranks were noted. SCOPUS

resultsThere was a significantly higher number of men (164, 88.17%) among academic faculty than women (22, 11.83%). As academic rank increased, the proportion of female urologists decreased. Overall, male urologists had higher academic ranks, h-index values, number of publications, and citations (p=0.038, p=0.0038, p=0.0011, and p=0.014, respectively). There was an insignificant difference between men and women with respect to their m-quotient medians (p=0.25).

conclusionsThere is an increasing number of women completing residency in urology, although there are disproportionally fewer female urologists at senior academic positions. Significant differences were found in the h-index, publication count, and citation number between male and female urologists. When using the m-quotient to adjust for temporal bias, no significant differences were found between the gender in terms of academic output.

Identifiers

PMID31702549
PMCPMC7124183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.