Trial reportThe Journal of urology2020
Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Systemic Chemotherapy Followed by Extirpative Surgery in Patients with High Grade Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.
Trial report in The Journal of urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02412670 (A Prospective Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Systemic Chemotherapy Followed by Extirpative Surgery for Patients With High Grade Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 61 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Systemic Chemotherapy Followed by Extirpative Surgery for Patients With High Grade Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma
Who cites it
61 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors for urothelial carcinoma: systematic review and Meta-analysis.World journal of urology · 2024Pooled it
- Analysis of Clinical Trials Using Anti-Tumor Traditional Chinese Medicine Monomers.Drug design, development and therapy · 2024Pooled it
- Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2021Pooled it
- A Phase 2 Study of Tislelizumab as Neoadjuvant Treatment of Cisplatin-Ineligible High-Risk Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.The Journal of urology · 2025Trial
- Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial of Gemcitabine and Cisplatin as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Patients With High-Grade Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023Trial
- Adjuvant chemotherapy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (the POUT trial): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial.Lancet (London, England) · 2020Trial
- Real-World Efficacy of Postoperative Adjuvant Nivolumab in High-Risk Urothelial Carcinoma: A Retrospective Comparative Study in an Asian Population.Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: interpreting durable long-term outcomes in a changing treatment landscape.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Modern management of locally advanced urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract.World journal of urology · 2026Review
- Clinical Trials and Emerging Therapeutic Paradigms in Upper-Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.Cancers · 2026Review
- A bibliometric study and visualization analysis of the current status and perspectives in upper tract urothelial carcinoma.Medicine · 2026Article
- Trends in Treatment and Perioperative Outcomes of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: The Evolving Role of Lymphadenectomy and Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Management and Treatment Strategies for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Current Insights.Research and reports in urology · 2026Review
- Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma in the setting of clinical node positive disease: analysis of the ROBUUST registry.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- Treatment Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Versus Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Overlap Weighting Analysis of a Multicenter Taiwanese Cohort.European urology open science · 2025Article
- Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Where Do We Stand?Cancers · 2025Article
- Review
- Neoadjuvant treatment patterns and biomarker selection in muscle-invasive bladder cancer.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Article
1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeData supporting neoadjuvant chemotherapy of high grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma are scant. In this multi-institution, prospective, phase II trial we investigated pathological complete responses after neoadjuvant chemotherapy of high grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma. MATERIALS AND
methodsPatients with high grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma in whom nephroureterectomy was planned were assigned to 4 neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles of accelerated methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin in those with baseline creatinine clearance greater than 50 ml per minute or gemcitabine and carboplatin in those with creatinine clearance 30 to 50 ml per minute or less. The study primary end point was a pathological complete response (ypT0N0). The accrual goal was 30 patients per arm. An 18% pathological complete response was considered worth further study while a 4% pathological complete response would not have justified pursuing this regimen. With 28 eligible patients per arm success was defined as 3 or more pathological complete responses (10.7%) in a given arm. Secondary end points included safety, renal function and oncologic outcomes.
resultsA total of 30 patients enrolled in the accelerated methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin arm from 2015 to 2017. Six patients enrolled in the gemcitabine and carboplatin arm, which closed due to poor accrual. Of the 29 patients eligible for accelerated methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin, including 23 men and 6 women with a median age of 65 years (range 40 to 84), 80% completed all planned treatments, 3 (10.3%) achieved ypT0N0 and 1 achieved ypT0Nx for a pathological complete response in 13.8% (90% CI 4.9-28.8). In 1 patient receiving accelerated methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin nephroureterectomy was deferred due to grade 4 sepsis. The grade 3-4 toxicity rate was 23% in the accelerated methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin arm with no grade 5 event.
conclusionsAccelerated methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with high grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma and creatinine clearance greater than 50 ml per minute was safe and demonstrated predefined activity with a 14% pathological complete response rate. Final pathological stage ypT1 or less in more than 60% of patients is encouraging. Together the results of this prospective trial support the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in eligible patients with high grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.