ArticleSuicide & life-threatening behavior2020
Conducting Research with Individuals at Risk for Suicide: Protocol for Assessment and Risk Management.
Article in Suicide & life-threatening behavior, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05613972 (Using Integrated Suicide and Trauma Therapy to Reduce Suicide Risk Among Adults With a History of Childhood Trauma), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Using Integrated Suicide and Trauma Therapy to Reduce Suicide Risk Among Adults With a History of Childhood Trauma
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Piloting an ecological momentary assessment block design to examine suicide outcomes and mechanisms in a caring contacts trial.Internet interventions · 2026Article
- Using smartphone surveys to predict next-week suicide attempts.Journal of psychopathology and clinical science · 2026Article
- Developing a Co-Produced Practice Framework to Support Personalised Safety Planning for Adults Experiencing Suicidality.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Exploring the Impact of the Caring Contacts Intervention on the Stress and Distress of Veterans and Service Members: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Examining the Construct Validity of Experimental Suicide Images Among Young Adults.Suicide & life-threatening behavior · 2025Article
- Suicide risk assessment and management protocol for research within the Department of Veterans Affairs.Journal of psychopathology and clinical science · 2025Article
- Risky decision-making and nonsuicidal self-injury among university students: Examining the role of criticism feedback.PloS one · 2024Article
- Suicide risk assessment and suicide risk management protocol for the Texas Youth Depression and Suicide Research Network.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2023Article
- Caring Texts, a strength-based, suicide prevention trial in 5 native communities: Research design and methods.Contemporary clinical trials · 2022Article
- Core components and strategies for suicide and risk management protocols in mental health research: a scoping review.BMC psychiatry · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveSuicide prediction, prevention, and intervention are urgent research areas. One barrier for research with high-risk populations is limited resources to manage risk in a research setting. We describe using the University of Washington Risk Assessment Protocol (UWRAP) to assess and manage suicide risk during phone-administered eligibility assessments in two clinical trials.
methodStudy 1 (N = 151) recruited suicidal adults who were not engaged in mental health treatment and Study 2 (N = 135) recruited suicidal adults who used alcohol to regulate emotions. Pre- and postassessment ratings of stress, urge to harm self, urge to use drugs/alcohol, and intent to harm self were compared and strategies to manage increased suicide risk following screening interviews were implemented, as indicated.
resultsIn both studies, average postassessment ratings were significantly lower than pre-assessment. A minority of participants reported higher ratings on one or more domains; however, following more thorough suicide risk assessment, risk was appropriately managed by providing low-level interventions (e.g., validation).
conclusionsSuicide risk in research involving community participants can be managed by using appropriate risk protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.