ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2020
Clinical Management of Patients with Dengue Infection in Japan: Results from National Database of Health Insurance Claims.
Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fluid management and outcomes of dengue fever in Japan: single-center descriptive study in a non-endemic country.Tropical medicine and health · 2026Article
- Patient and National Economic Burden of Dengue in Japan: Results from Japanese National Claims Database.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dengue guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and control (WHO, 2011) recommend acetaminophen and isotonic fluid for patients with dengue infection but do not recommend nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and hypotonic fluid. Other research showed no evidence of efficacy of platelet infusion in prophylactic. This research aims to clarify to what extent dengue patients were managed in accordance with the guidelines in Japan. We extracted claim data of patients with either dengue fever (DF) or dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) from the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan between 2011 and 2015. The total number of patients was 1,370, which consisted of 1,306 DF patients and 64 DHF patients; 185 patients were younger than (<) 20 years and 1,185 patients were aged 20 years or older (≥). Among them, 24.5% of DF patients and 48.4% of DHF patients received hypotonic intravenous fluid, 12.9% and 18.8% NSAIDs, and 1.3% and 17.2% platelet transfusion, respectively. Comparing patients aged < 20 years with patients aged ≥ 20 years, 57.8% and 54.5% received acetaminophen, 6.5% and 14.3% received NSAIDs, 40.0% and 38.3% received isotonic fluid, and 37.8% and 23.7% received hypotonic fluid, respectively. Platelet transfusion was used for 1.3% of DH and 17.2% of DHF patients. The study indicated that dengue patients in Japan might have increased risks of developing adverse events because of receiving the treatment that the guidelines do not recommend. More effort is needed to facilitate medical practitioners to follow the guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.