Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31701471›Full record

ReviewPharmacoEconomics2020

Fluocinolone Acetonide Intravitreal Implant for Treating Recurrent Non-infectious Uveitis: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.

Xavier G L V Pouwels, Svenja Petersohn, Vanesa Huertas Carrera, Alastair K Denniston, Annette Chalker, Heike Raatz, Nigel Armstrong, Dhwani Shah, Willem Witlox, Gill Worthy and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PharmacoEconomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. [Guidelines nr. 24a intermediate uveitis].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Xavier G L V PouwelsMaastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands. xavier.pouwels@mumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-3563-0013
Svenja PetersohnMaastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Vanesa Huertas CarreraKleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK.
Alastair K DennistonUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Annette ChalkerKleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK.
Heike RaatzKleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK.
Nigel ArmstrongKleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK.
Dhwani ShahKleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK.
Willem WitloxMaastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Gill WorthyKleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK.
Caro NoakeKleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK.
Rob RiemsmaKleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK.
Jos KleijnenKleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK.
Manuela A JooreMaastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom) · GBMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLMaastricht University · NLUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health 16/119/02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) invited Alimera Sciences, the company manufacturing fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant (FAc) 0.19 mg (tradename ILUVIEN

Indexed as

Anti-Inflammatory AgentsCost-Benefit AnalysisDrug ImplantsFluocinolone AcetonideHumansIntravitreal InjectionsQuality-Adjusted Life YearsRecurrenceTreatment OutcomeUveitisAnti-Inflammatory AgentsDrug ImplantsFluocinolone Acetonide

Identifiers

PMID31701471
PMCPMC7176320
OpenAlexW2983759846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.