Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31701368›Full record

ReviewCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2019

Early Management of CML.

Naranie Shanmuganathan, Timothy P Hughes

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Naranie ShanmuganathanPrecision Medicine Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. naranie.shanmuganathan@sa.gov.au.
Timothy P HughesPrecision Medicine Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe marked improvement in clinical outcomes for patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) can be solely attributed to the introduction of targeted therapies against the fusion oncoprotein, BCR-ABL1. However, patient responses, although generally positive, remain heterogenous. Careful drug selection, ensuring the optimal TKI, is chosen for each patient and involves a complex decision process which incorporates consideration of numerous factors. RECENT

findingsFor some patients, with disease characteristics that indicate adverse intrinsic disease biology, more potent BCR-ABL1 inhibition is often appropriate, whereas other patients with major co-morbidities will benefit from a less aggressive approach to avoid life-shortening toxicities. For the vast majority of patients, the long-term goal of therapy will be the achievement of a deep molecular response and subsequent treatment-free remission and this consideration will play a large part in the drug selection process. We explore early management of CML, from the first presentation through to frontline therapy selection.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsClinical Decision-MakingComorbidityDisease ManagementEarly Detection of CancerFamily Planning ServicesFertility PreservationGenetic TestingHumansLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveMedication AdherenceRetreatmentTime FactorsTime-to-TreatmentTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsDeep molecular responsesDrug toxicityTKITreatment-free remission

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.