Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31701343›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2020

Weak MGMT gene promoter methylation confers a clinically significant survival benefit in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a retrospective cohort study.

H Pinson, G Hallaert, J Van der Meulen, F Dedeurwaerdere, D Vanhauwaert, C Van den Broecke, J Van Dorpe, D Van Roost, J P Kalala, T Boterberg

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The predictive value of partialNeuro-oncology practice · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. A Comparison ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. New strategies for managing adult gliomas.Journal of neurology · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Liquid biopsy in NSCLC: a new challenge in radiation therapy.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

H PinsonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. harry.pinson@ugent.be.
G HallaertDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
J Van der MeulenCenter for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
F DedeurwaerdereDepartment of Pathology, AZ Delta, Roeselare, Belgium.
D VanhauwaertDepartment of Neurosurgery, AZ Delta, Roeselare, Belgium.
C Van den BroeckeDepartment of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
J Van DorpeDepartment of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
D Van RoostDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
J P KalalaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
T BoterbergDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionQuantitative methylation specific PCR (qMSP) is a frequently used technique to assess MGMT gene promoter methylation in glioblastoma patients. The optimal technical cut-off value to distinguish methylated from unmethylated samples is nevertheless still undetermined. In literature, a "grey zone" of diagnostic uncertainty has been described.

methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients treated according to the Stupp protocol. Epidemiological data were gathered from the individual patient files. MGMT gene promoter methylation status was determined on stored tumour samples using qMSP. A strong, weak or absent promoter methylation was determined based on Cq values (quantification value) of the MGMT and ACTB primers as well as a positive control sample.

resultsIn total, 181 patient files were reviewed and included for statistical analysis. MGMT promoter hypermethylation was detected in 38.7% of glioblastoma patients. The median overall survival of unmethylated and strongly methylated patients was 10.1 months and 19.7 months respectively. Furthermore, 11% of the total patient cohort had a weak MGMT gene promoter methylation. The median OS in this subgroup was 15.4 months, significantly better compared to the unmethylated cohort (P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed weak MGMT promoter methylation as an independent prognostic parameter for overall survival.

conclusionGlioblastoma patients with weak promoter methylation show a statistically significant longer overall survival when compared to clearly unmethylated patients. Patients with grey zone qMSP test results should receive additional molecular analysis in future to further direct individual therapy strategies.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticAgedAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyCombined Modality TherapyDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlioblastomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingBiomarkers, TumorDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesMGMT protein, humanTemozolomideTumor Suppressor ProteinsGlioblastomaMGMT gene methylationPrognosisqMSP

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.