ArticleJournal of neurology2020
Cerebrospinal fluid non-phosphorylated tau in the differential diagnosis of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: a comparative prospective study with 14-3-3.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers in Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease: Diagnostic Value, Limitations, and Future Multi-Omics Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Diagnosis of Prion Diseases.Sub-cellular biochemistry · 2025Review
- Biological Fluid Biomarkers in Human Prion Diseases with a Note on Biosafety.Sub-cellular biochemistry · 2025Review
- 14-3-3 proteins-a moonlight protein complex with therapeutic potential in neurological disorder: in-depth review with Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2024Review
- Role of Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Prion Diseases: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Review
- Comparison of cerebrospinal fluid tau, ptau(181), synuclein, and 14-3-3 for the detection of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in clinical practice.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2022Article
- Article
- Challenges and Advances in Antemortem Diagnosis of Human Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) non-phosphorylated tau (non-p-tau) is increased in sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD), but its accuracy in the differential diagnosis has not been previously established. Here, we first used a retrospective cohort of non-CJD (n = 135) and CJD (n = 137) cases to determine the optimal cutoff point for the discrimination of CJD cases. Next, we prospectively quantified non-p-tau and 14-3-3 protein in a cohort of 1427 cases received for CSF testing at the German National Reference Center for transmissible spongiform encephalopathies. Among them, 36 were subsequently diagnosed as CJD. The diagnostic accuracy of both proteins discriminating CJD cases was evaluated. Using a cutoff of 650 pg/mL, non-p-tau displayed 94.39% accuracy in discriminating CJD cases, while 92.92% accuracy was achieved by 14-3-3 using a cutoff of 20,000 AU/mL. Diagnostic test evaluation for both proteins showed a slightly better performance of non-p-tau compared to 14-3-3. The two biomarkers' concentrations showed a significant positive correlation, both in the total population and in CJD cases (p < 0.001). Finally, the analysis of CSF non-p-tau concentrations when undergoing pre-analytical factors showed high stability in front of temperature storage and freeze/thaw cycles. Therefore, we conclude that when used in the appropriate clinical context of a prion disease surveillance center, non-p-tau is a highly sensitive and specific diagnostic marker for CJD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.