Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31701304›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2020

Similar miRNomic signatures characterize the follicular fluids collected after follicular and luteal phase stimulations in the same ovarian cycle.

Danilo Cimadomo, Ramona Carmelo, Elvira Immacolata Parrotta, Stefania Scalise, Gianluca Santamaria, Erminia Alviggi, Maria Teresa De Angelis, Gianmarco Sarro, Alberto Vaiarelli, Roberta Venturella and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Danilo CimadomoGENERA centers for reproductive medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5390-9221
Ramona CarmeloGENERA centers for reproductive medicine, Clinica Ruesch, Naples, Italy.
Elvira Immacolata ParrottaUniversità degli Studi Magna Graecia di Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Stefania ScaliseUniversità degli Studi Magna Graecia di Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Gianluca SantamariaUniversità degli Studi Magna Graecia di Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Erminia AlviggiGENERA centers for reproductive medicine, Clinica Ruesch, Naples, Italy.
Maria Teresa De AngelisUniversità degli Studi Magna Graecia di Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Gianmarco SarroUniversità degli Studi Magna Graecia di Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Alberto VaiarelliGENERA centers for reproductive medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy.
Roberta VenturellaUniversità degli Studi Magna Graecia di Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Laura RienziGENERA centers for reproductive medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy.
Fulvio ZulloUniversità degli Studi Magna Graecia di Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Filippo Maria UbaldiGENERA centers for reproductive medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy.
Giovanni CudaUniversità degli Studi Magna Graecia di Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo detect putative differences in the miRNomic profile of follicular fluids collected after follicular-phase-stimulation (FPS-FFs) and paired luteal-phase-stimulation (LPS-FFs) in the same ovarian cycles (DuoStim).

methodsExploratory study at a private IVF center and University involving FPS-FFs and paired-LPS-FFs collected from 15 reduced ovarian reserve and advanced maternal age women undergoing DuoStim (n = 30 paired samples). The samples were combined in 6 paired pools (5 samples each) and balanced according to maternal age and number of cumulus-oocyte-complexes. Micro-RNAs were isolated and sequenced. Four miRNAs were then selected for further validation on 6 single pairs of FPS-FFs and LPS-FFs by qPCR.

resultsForty-three miRNAs were detected in both FPS-FFs and paired-LPS-FFs after sequencing and no statistically significant differences were reported. Thirty-three KEGG pathways were identified as regulated from the detected miRNAs. Four miRNAs (miR-146b, miR-191, miR-320a, and miR-483) were selected for qPCR validation since consistently expressed in our samples and possibly involved in the regulation/establishment of a healthy follicular environment. Again, no significant differences were reported between FPS-FFs and paired-LPS-FFs, also when the analysis was corrected for maternal age and number of cumulus-oocyte-complexes in generalized linear models.

conclusionsThese data complement the embryological, chromosomal, and clinical evidence of equivalence between FPS and LPS published to date.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleFollicular FluidFollicular PhaseGene Expression ProfilingHumansInfertility, FemaleLuteal PhaseMenstrual CycleMicroRNAsOvulation InductionMicroRNAsDouble stimulationDuoStimFollicular fluidLuteal phase stimulationmiRNA

Identifiers

PMID31701304
PMCPMC7000610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.