Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31701294›Full record

ArticleAdministration and policy in mental health2020

Psychometric Properties of a Fidelity Scale for Illness Management and Recovery.

Karina Myhren Egeland, Kristin Sverdvik Heiervang, Matthew Landers, Torleif Ruud, Robert E Drake, Gary R Bond

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Administration and policy in mental health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03271242 (A Pairwise Randomized Study on Implementation of Guidelines and Evidence Based Treatments of Psychoses), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03271242 completednot on this map

A Pairwise Randomized Study on Implementation of Guidelines and Evidence Based Treatments of Psychoses

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital, AkershusRan2016 to 2018Enrolled325ConditionsPsychotic DisordersArmsSystematic implementation support, No implementation support
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Fidelity Scale: From Black Box to Holy Grail.Administration and policy in mental health · 2020
    Article
  12. Measuring Fidelity to Evidence-Based Practices: Psychometrics.Administration and policy in mental health · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Karina Myhren EgelandDivision of Mental Health Services, Akershus University Hospital, Sykehusveien 25, 1478, Lørenskog, Norway. karina.egeland@nkvts.no.
Kristin Sverdvik HeiervangDivision of Mental Health Services, Akershus University Hospital, Sykehusveien 25, 1478, Lørenskog, Norway.
Matthew LandersWestat, Philadelphia, USA.
Torleif RuudDivision of Mental Health Services, Akershus University Hospital, Sykehusveien 25, 1478, Lørenskog, Norway.
Robert E DrakeWestat, Philadelphia, USA.
Gary R BondWestat, Philadelphia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined the psychometric properties and feasibility of the Illness Management and Recovery (IMR) Fidelity scale. Despite widespread use of the scale, the psychometric properties have received limited attention. Trained fidelity assessors conducted assessments four times over 18 months at 11 sites implementing IMR. The IMR Fidelity scale showed excellent interrater reliability (.99), interrater item agreement (94%), internal consistency (.91-.95 at three time points), and sensitivity to change. Frequency distributions generally showed that item ratings included the entire range. The IMR Fidelity scale has excellent psychometric properties and should be used to evaluate and guide the implementation of IMR.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03271242.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsIllness Management and RecoveryIMR Fidelity scaleMeasurementPsychometric properties

Identifiers

PMID31701294
PMCPMC7547988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.