Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31701236›Full record

Observational studyPediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2020

A single-center study to evaluate the efficacy of a fetal urine peptide signature predicting postnatal renal outcome in fetuses with posterior urethral valves.

Bénédicte Buffin-Meyer, Marcin Tkaczyk, Małgorzata Stańczyk, Benjamin Breuil, Justyna Siwy, Krzysztof Szaflik, Tomasz Talar, Justyna Wojtera, Waldemar Krzeszowski, Stéphane Decramer and 2 more

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Prenatal body fluid analysis in the evaluation of CAKUT.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Bénédicte Buffin-MeyerInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), U1048, Institut of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disease, Toulouse, France.
Marcin TkaczykDepartment of Pediatrics, Immunology and Nephrology, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital Research Institute, Lodz, Poland.
Małgorzata StańczykDepartment of Pediatrics, Immunology and Nephrology, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital Research Institute, Lodz, Poland.
Benjamin BreuilInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), U1048, Institut of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disease, Toulouse, France.
Justyna SiwyMosaiques diagnostics GmbH, Hannover, Germany.
Krzysztof SzaflikDepartment of Genecology, Fertility and Fetal Therapy, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital - Research Institute, Lodz, Poland.
Tomasz TalarDepartment of Neonatology, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital - Research Institute, Lodz, Poland.
Justyna WojteraDepartment of Genecology, Fertility and Fetal Therapy, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital - Research Institute, Lodz, Poland.
Waldemar KrzeszowskiDepartment of Genecology, Fertility and Fetal Therapy, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital - Research Institute, Lodz, Poland.
Stéphane DecramerInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), U1048, Institut of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disease, Toulouse, France.
Julie KleinInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), U1048, Institut of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disease, Toulouse, France.
Joost P SchanstraInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), U1048, Institut of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disease, Toulouse, France. joost-peter.schanstra@inserm.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7471-372X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPosterior urethral valves (PUVs) account for 17% of pediatric renal failure. The management of pregnancies involving fetuses with PUV is hampered by the fact that current clinical parameters obtained from fetal ultrasound and/or fetal urine biochemistry are insufficient to predict postnatal renal function. We previously have developed a fetal urine peptide signature (12PUV) that predicted with high precision postnatal renal failure at 2 years of age in fetuses with PUV. Here, we evaluated the accuracy of this signature to predict postnatal renal outcome in fetuses with PUV in an independent single-center study.

methodsThirty-three women carrying fetuses with suspected PUV were included. Twenty-five fetuses received vesicoamniotic shunts during pregnancy. PUV was confirmed postnatally in 23 patients. Of those 23 fetuses, 2 were lost in follow-up. Four and 3 patients died in the pre- and perinatal periods, respectively. Follow-up renal function at 6 months of age was obtained for the remaining 14 patients. The primary outcome was early renal failure, defined by an eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m

resultsThe peptide signature predicted postnatal renal outcome in postnatally confirmed PUV fetuses with an AUC of 0.94 (95%CI 0.74-1.0) and an accuracy of 90% (95%CI 78-100). The signature predicted postnatal renal outcome for the suspected PUV cases with an AUC of 0.89 (95%CI 0.72-0.97) and an accuracy of 84% (95%CI 71-97).

conclusionsThis single-center study confirms the predictive power of the previously identified 12PUV fetal urinary peptide signature.

Indexed as

Anastomosis, SurgicalFeasibility StudiesFemaleFetal DiseasesFetal TherapiesFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantInfant, NewbornKidney Function TestsMalePeptidesPredictive Value of TestsPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisRenal InsufficiencyPeptidesChronic kidney diseaseOutcomePredictionPrenatalRare diseaseUrinary proteome analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.