Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31701225›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2021

Cognitive and affective Theory of Mind in adolescence: developmental aspects and associated neuropsychological variables.

Edith Theresa Gabriel, Raphaela Oberger, Michaela Schmoeger, Matthias Deckert, Stefanie Vockh, Eduard Auff, Ulrike Willinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Phubbing as a social-cognitive failure: Affective theory of mind as a candidate mechanism.Dusunen adam : Bakirkoy Ruh ve Sinir Hastaliklari Hastanesi yayin organi · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Affective Theory of Mind and linguistic intimacy in irony production: a developmental perspective.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Edith Theresa GabrielDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Raphaela ObergerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Michaela SchmoegerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5894-3405
Matthias DeckertDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3003-3578
Stefanie VockhDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Eduard AuffDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Ulrike WillingerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. ulrike.willinger@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1412-9927

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theory of Mind (ToM) is the ability to represent and attribute mental states to oneself and others. So far, research regarding ToM processing across adolescence is scarce. Existing studies either yield inconsistent results or did not or not thoroughly investigate aspects like higher order ToM and associated neuropsychological variables which the current study tried to address. 643 typically developing early, middle, and late adolescents (age groups 13-14; 15-16; 17-18) performed cognitive and affective ToM tasks as well as neuropsychological tasks tapping the cognitive or affective domain. Regarding both ToM types, 15- to 16-year-olds and 17- to 18-year-olds outperformed 13- to 14-year-olds, whereas females were superior regarding cognitive ToM. Across adolescence, cognitive and affective ToM correlated with attention and affective intelligence, whereas working memory, language comprehension, and figural intelligence additionally correlated with cognitive ToM. In early adolescence, attention correlated with both ToM types, whereas cognitive ToM further correlated with language comprehension and affective ToM with verbal intelligence, verbal fluency, and verbal flexibility. In middle and late adolescence, affective intelligence correlated with both ToM types, whereas cognitive ToM additionally correlated with working memory, language comprehension, and figural intelligence. The current study shows a developmental step regarding cognitive and affective ToM in middle adolescence as well as gender differences in cognitive ToM processing. Associations between neuropsychological variables and ToM processing were shown across adolescence and within age groups. Results give new insights into social cognition in adolescence and are well supported by neuroscientific and neurobiological studies regarding ToM and the integration of cognitive and affective processes.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdolescent BehaviorAffectCognitionEmotionsFemaleHumansIntelligenceMaleMemory, Short-TermNeuropsychological TestsSocial SkillsTheory of Mind

Identifiers

PMID31701225
PMCPMC7900042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.