Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31701218›Full record

ReviewWiener klinische Wochenschrift2021

Update on hyperbaric oxygen therapy in burn treatment.

Laurenz Weitgasser, Gerald Ihra, Bruno Schäfer, Klaus Markstaller, Christine Radtke

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. An Overview of Recent Developments in the Management of Burn Injuries.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy in low extremity trauma: A case series.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Focused ultrasound ablation of a large canine oral tumor achieves efficient tumor remission: a case report.International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laurenz WeitgasserDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. laurenz.weitgasser@gmail.com.
Gerald IhraDepartment of Anesthesia, General Intensive Care and Pain Management, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Bruno SchäferDepartment of Anesthesia, General Intensive Care and Pain Management, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Klaus MarkstallerDepartment of Anesthesia, General Intensive Care and Pain Management, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Christine RadtkeDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has been shown to improve tissue hypoxia, neovascularization and ischemia reperfusion injury and reduce pathologic inflammation in various clinical settings and was proposed to be a game changer in treatment of burns. Improved and faster wound healing as well as a reduction of morbidity and mortality after thermal and concomitant carbon monoxide poisoning are expected. In defiance of the observed benefits for burn wounds and carbon monoxide poisoning in animal models and few randomized controlled trials there is an ongoing controversy regarding its use, indications and cost effectiveness. Furthermore, the use of HBOT, its indications and the evidence behind its efficiency are still widely unknown to most physicians involved in the treatment of burn patients. Therefore, a review of the up to date evidence-based literature was performed with a focus on available data of HBOT in burn care, to elaborate its use in acute thermal injury and carbon monoxide intoxication. Although beneficial effects of HBOT seem very likely insufficient evidence to support or disprove the routine use of HBOT in the treatment of burn care was found. Although difficult to carry out because of the high interindividual variability of burns and chronic wounds, the need for larger high-quality prospective randomized double-blinded controlled multicenter trials are necessary to be able to evaluate useful applications, expense and cost-efficiency of HBOT for burn care.

Indexed as

BurnsHyperbaric OxygenationPlastic Surgery ProceduresHumansProspective StudiesWound HealingCarbon monoxidePlastic surgeryReconstructive surgeryReviewThermal injury

Identifiers

PMID31701218
OpenAlexW2989219170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.