Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31701169›Full record

ReviewHNO2019

[Update on HPV-associated head and neck cancer-highlights from the 2019 ASCO Annual Meeting].

S Tribius, N Würdemann, S Laban, T K Hoffmann, S J Sharma, J P Klussmann

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in HNO, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02281955 (De-intensification of Radiation and Chemotherapy for Low-Risk HPV-related Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02281955 phase2completednot on this map

De-intensification of Radiation and Chemotherapy for Low-Risk HPV-related Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorUNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterRan2014 to 2024Enrolled115ConditionsCarcinoma, Squamous Cell, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Oropharyngeal NeoplasmsArmsIntensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT), Cisplatin (or alternative), Assessment for surgical evaluation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

S TribiusAsklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Hermann-Holthusen-Institut für Strahlentherapie, Lohmühlenstraße 5, 20099, Hamburg, Deutschland. s.tribius@asklepios.com.
N WürdemannMedizinische Fakultät, Klinik für Hals‑, Nasen‑, Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Universitätsklinik zu Köln, Köln, Deutschland.
S LabanKopf-Hals-Tumorzentrum des Comprehensive Cancer Center Ulm, Klinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde und Kopf-Hals-Chirurgie, Universitätsklinik Ulm, Ulm, Deutschland.
T K HoffmannKopf-Hals-Tumorzentrum des Comprehensive Cancer Center Ulm, Klinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde und Kopf-Hals-Chirurgie, Universitätsklinik Ulm, Ulm, Deutschland.
S J SharmaMedizinische Fakultät, Klinik für Hals‑, Nasen‑, Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Universitätsklinik zu Köln, Köln, Deutschland.
J P KlussmannMedizinische Fakultät, Klinik für Hals‑, Nasen‑, Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Universitätsklinik zu Köln, Köln, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At this year's Annual Meeting of the American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO), the keyword search "HPV-associated head and neck cancer" resulted in 920 hits-74% of the hits on human papillomavirus (HPV). This underlines the relevance of the topic. The spectrum ranged from validation and separation of the prognostic groups of patients with HPV-associated oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPSCC) according to TNM 8, to the characterization of new tumor markers and tumor mutational burden for possible de-escalation strategies to avoid toxicity of standard multimodal treatments. It has been shown that the separation of p16-positive OPSCC into Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) stages I and II with the current TNM 8 classification without further markers is not sufficiently successful to justify de-escalation strategies. Following publication of the results of the De-ESCALaTE- and RTOG-1016 trials in 2018, which confirm the current standard of care for p16-positive OPSCC, no further phase III studies on de-escalation were presented. In a presented prospective phase II study (NCT02281955), the radiotherapy dose was reduced to cumulative 60 Gy, whereby the simultaneous chemotherapy regimen with cisplatin 30 mg/m

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsOropharyngeal NeoplasmsPapillomavirus InfectionsCongresses as TopicHumansMedical OncologyPapillomaviridaeProspective StudiesUnited StatesBiomarkerCombined modality therapyGastrointestinal MicrobiomeImmunotherapyOropharyngeal neoplasms

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.