Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31701121›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2020

Dissociable Mechanisms of Verbal Working Memory Revealed through Multivariate Lesion Mapping.

Maryam Ghaleh, Elizabeth H Lacey, Mackenzie E Fama, Zainab Anbari, Andrew T DeMarco, Peter E Turkeltaub

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Is working memory domain-general or domain-specific?Trends in cognitive sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Lesion mapping in neuropsychological research: A practical and conceptual guide.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Naturalistic Language Input is Associated with Resting-State Functional Connectivity in Infancy.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Lesion-Based Disconnectome Explains Cognitive Outcomes in Multiple Sclerosis.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maryam GhalehDepartment of Neurology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20057, USA.
Elizabeth H LaceyDepartment of Neurology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20057, USA.
Mackenzie E FamaDepartment of Neurology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20057, USA.
Zainab AnbariDepartment of Neurology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20057, USA.
Andrew T DeMarcoDepartment of Neurology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20057, USA.
Peter E TurkeltaubDepartment of Neurology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20057, USA.

Funding

Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR001432 · NCATS · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI UMANS, JASON G · 2015 to 2024
$7.5M
Translational Biomedical Science Training GrantTL1TR001431 · NCATS · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI LEE, DEXTER L, SANDBERG, KATHRYN L · 2015 to 2024
$4.8M
Contributions of spared brain structures and connections to aphasia recoveryR01DC014960 · NIDCD · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI TURKELTAUB, PETER ETHAN · 2017 to 2021
$4.0M
Georgetown-Howard Universities Center for Clinical and Translational Science (GHUKL2TR000102 · NCATS · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI MELLMAN, THOMAS A, VERBALIS, JOSEPH G · 2012 to 2014
$1.7M
Investigating insight into inner speech in aphasiaR03DC014310 · NIDCD · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI TURKELTAUB, PETER ETHAN · 2015 to 2017
$462k
Using self-reported inner speech to guide treatment for anomiaF31DC014875 · NIDCD · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI FAMA, MACKENZIE ELIZABETH · 2015 to 2017
$93k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000102NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001432NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001431NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC014875NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014960NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC014310
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two maintenance mechanisms with separate neural systems have been suggested for verbal working memory: articulatory-rehearsal and non-articulatory maintenance. Although lesion data would be key to understanding the essential neural substrates of these systems, there is little evidence from lesion studies that the two proposed mechanisms crucially rely on different neuroanatomical substrates. We examined 39 healthy adults and 71 individuals with chronic left-hemisphere stroke to determine if verbal working memory tasks with varying demands would rely on dissociable brain structures. Multivariate lesion-symptom mapping was used to identify the brain regions involved in each task, controlling for spatial working memory scores. Maintenance of verbal information relied on distinct brain regions depending on task demands: sensorimotor cortex under higher demands and superior temporal gyrus (STG) under lower demands. Inferior parietal cortex and posterior STG were involved under both low and high demands. These results suggest that maintenance of auditory information preferentially relies on auditory-phonological storage in the STG via a nonarticulatory maintenance when demands are low. Under higher demands, sensorimotor regions are crucial for the articulatory rehearsal process, which reduces the reliance on STG for maintenance. Lesions to either of these regions impair maintenance of verbal information preferentially under the appropriate task conditions.

Indexed as

AgedBrain MappingFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMemory, Short-TermMiddle AgedStrokeTemporal LobeVerbal Learningarticulatory rehearsallesion–symptom mappingnonarticulatory maintenanceverbal working memoryworking memory demands

Identifiers

PMID31701121
PMCPMC7305798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.