ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2019
Gastric cancer surgery: historical background and perspective in Western countries versus Japan.
Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unraveling the risks: A systematic review of factors leading to esophagojejunal dehiscence after gastric cancer surgery.Surgery open science · 2026Review
- Article
- Association between residual gastric volume and long-term postoperative sleep disturbances in gastric cancer survivors.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Review
- Cost analysis of laparoscopic total versus open total gastrectomy in gastric cancer.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Article
- Subtotal versus total gastrectomy for distal diffuse-type gastric cancer.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Gastric Cancer Surgery: Balancing Oncological Efficacy against Postoperative Morbidity and Function Detriment.Cancers · 2024Review
- Current standards of surgical management of gastric cancer: an appraisal.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023Review
- Occult Omental Metastasis in Gastric Adenocarcinoma: An Analysis of Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes.South Asian journal of cancer · 2022Article
- Article
- Citation classics: the 50 most cited articles in surgery in Asia.Turkish journal of surgery · 2021Article
- Lymph Node Involvement in Advanced Gastric Cancer in the Era of Multimodal Treatment-Oncological and Surgical Perspective.Cancers · 2021Review
- Short-term outcomes of gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for clinical stage III gastric cancer: propensity score-matched analysis of a multi-institutional database.Surgery today · 2021Article
- Surgical outcomes and survival for T4 gastric cancer extending to the transverse colon.Annals of translational medicine · 2020Article
- Which is the optimal management for locally advanced gastric cancer patients with TRG 0 and 1 after R0 resection?Annals of translational medicine · 2020Article
- Comparison on the Efficacy of Double Tract Gastric Interposition Reconstruction Versus Jejunal Interposition Reconstruction After Proximal Gastrectomy.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2020Article
- Cancer-associated fibroblasts promote the migration and invasion of gastric cancer cells via activating IL-17a/JAK2/STAT3 signaling.Annals of translational medicine · 2020Article
- An evaluation of the feasibility of an expanded indication of endoscopic submucosal dissection for ulcer positive early gastric cancer: a case-control study from two medical centers.Annals of translational medicine · 2020Article
- Urachal carcinoma: Impact of recurrence pattern and lymphadenectomy on long-term outcomes.Cancer medicine · 2020Article
- Burgeoning study of sentinel-node analysis on management of early gastric cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastrectomy plus D2 lymphadenectomy plays a decisive role in the management of resectable gastric cancer in Japan. Before recent advances in chemotherapy, Japanese surgeons considered that extensive surgery involving extended lymphadenectomy with combined resection of neighboring organ(s) was required to eliminate any possible lymphatic cancer spread and improve patient survival. This approach differs radically from that in Western countries, which aim to improve survival outcomes by multidisciplinary approaches including perioperative chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy with limited lymph node dissection. However, a randomized controlled trial conducted in Japan found that more extensive lymphadenectomy including the para-aortic lymph nodes provided no survival benefit over D2 lymphadenectomy. Splenic hilum dissection with splenectomy also failed to show superiority over the procedure without splenectomy in patients with proximal gastric cancer, except in cases with tumor invasion of the greater curvature. Furthermore, bursectomy recently demonstrated similar outcomes to omentectomy alone. Although "D2 lymphadenectomy" as carried out in Japan contributes to low local recurrence rates and good survival outcomes, the results of randomized controlled trials have led to a decreased extent of surgical resection, with no apparent adverse effects on survival outcome. Notably, gastrectomy with D2 dissection has tended to become acceptable for advanced gastric cancer in Western countries, based on the latest results of the Dutch D1D2 trial. Differences in surgical practices between the West and Japan have thus lessened and procedures are becoming more standardized. Japanese D2 lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer is evolving toward more minimally invasive approaches, while consistently striving to achieve the optimal surgical extent, thereby promoting consensus with Western counterparts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.