Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31700852›Full record

ReviewDermatopathology (Basel, Switzerland)

An Update on Adverse Cutaneous Drug Reactions in HIV/AIDS.

Koraisha Hoosen, Anisa Mosam, Ncoza Cordelia Dlova, Wayne Grayson

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dermatopathology (Basel, Switzerland). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Current Perspectives on Severe Drug Eruption.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2021
    Review
  12. Mass migration and climate change: Dermatologic manifestations.International journal of women's dermatology · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Koraisha HoosenDepartment of Dermatology, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Anisa MosamDepartment of Dermatology, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Ncoza Cordelia DlovaDepartment of Dermatology, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Wayne GraysonDivision of Anatomical Pathology, School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
University of KwaZulu-Natal · ZAUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe global mortality from HIV and the cutaneous burden of infective, inflammatory and malignant diseases in the setting of AIDS have significantly declined following the advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Regrettably, there has been a contemporaneous escalation in the incidence of adverse cutaneous drug reactions (ACDR), with studies attesting that HIV-positive individuals are a hundred times more susceptible to drug reactions than the general population, and advanced immunodeficiency portending an even greater risk. Several variables are accountable for this amplified risk in HIV. SUMMARY: Adverse reactions to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole are the most common, increasing from approximately 2-8% in the general population over to 43% amongst HIV-positive individuals to approximately 69% in subjects with AIDS. Antituberculosis drugs and antiretrovirals are also well-known instigators of ACDR. Cutaneous reactions range from mild morbilliform eruptions to severe, life-threatening manifestations in the form of Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis. Histological features vary from vacuolar interface changes to full-thickness epidermal necrosis with subepidermal blister formation. A precipitous diagnosis of the ACDR, clinically and histologically if necessary, together with the isolation of the causative drug is critical. The identification process, however, is often complex and multifaceted due to polypharmacy and inconclusive data on which drugs are the most likely offending agents, especially against the background of tuberculosis co-infection. KEY MESSAGES: Whilst milder cutaneous reactions are treated symptomatically, severe reactions mandate immediate treatment discontinuation without rechallenge. Further studies are required to establish safe rechallenge guidelines in resource-limited settings with a high HIV and tuberculosis prevalence.

Indexed as

Cutaneous reactionDrug reactionHIV

Identifiers

PMID31700852
PMCPMC6827458
OpenAlexW2955016485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.