ArticleJournal of virus eradication2019
Evaluation of clinicians' knowledge of and attitudes to Ebola virus disease in Ebonyi State, Nigeria.
Article in Journal of virus eradication, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEbola virus disease (EVD) remains a global threat of international concern. Being at the frontline of medical care, clinicians are at high risk of infection. Inadequate knowledge of, or poor attitudes to, EVD among clinicians may lead to failure in the detection of and timely responses to EVD. We determined the knowledge of and attitudes to EVD among clinicians in Ebonyi State, Nigeria. MATERIALS AND
methodsA descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted among clinicians attending an EVD training programme in Ebonyi State, Nigeria. Knowledge and attitudes of the clinicians were evaluated using a structured questionnaire. Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics.
resultsOf 398 clinicians who participated in the study, 274 (68.8%) were 40 years and below and 312 (78.4%) were male. Most of the clinicians surveyed (298, 74.9%) had worked for 10 years or less, and 354 (88.9%) of them had not undergone any training on EVD. The overall mean knowledge score of EVD among respondents was 42.0 ± 3.9 (maximum 51), and 370 (93.0%) respondents had a good overall knowledge of EVD. Overall, 334 (83.9%) respondents had an appropriate attitude towards EVD control, while 64 (16.1%) had a poor attitude towards EVD control. Only male gender was an independent predictor of good knowledge of EVD (adjusted odds ratio 4.0, 95% confidence interval 1.8-9.0).
conclusionsThere was generally a high level of knowledge and good attitude to EVD among the clinicians surveyed. The gaps in knowledge and attitudes identified should inform post-EVD control strategies and future training programmes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31700659PMC6816123W2984772800What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.