ArticleMediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases2019
Is it Safe and Cost Saving to Defer the CD4+ Cell Count Monitoring in Stable Patients on Art with More than 350 or 500 cells/μl?
Article in Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhanced metabolic health and immune response with bictegravir/emtricitabine/TAF: Insights from a 96‑week retrospective study.Biomedical reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Entangled Connections: HIV and HPV Interplay in Cervical Cancer-A Comprehensive Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Complications in People Living with HIV: A Focused Review.Infectious disease reports · 2024Review
- Navigating the Nexus: HIV and Breast Cancer-A Critical Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Long-Term Survivors in a Cohort of People Living with HIV Diagnosed between 1985 and 1994: Predictive Factors Associated with More Than 25 Years of Survival.Infectious disease reports · 2023Article
- Possible role of low dose dexamethasone administration in listeria monocytogenes meningoencephalitis: A case series.Biomedical reports · 2022Article
- Oral Fosfomycin Formulation in Bacterial Prostatitis: New Role for an Old Molecule-Brief Literature Review and Clinical Considerations.Infectious disease reports · 2022Review
- Updates in central nervous system malaria: literature review and considerations.Current opinion in infectious diseases · 2022Review
- Sarilumab Administration in COVID-19 Patients: Literature Review and Considerations.Infectious disease reports · 2022Review
- Loco-Regional Treatments for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in People Living with HIV.Infectious disease reports · 2022Review
- Article
- Immunological and Clinical Impact of DAA-Mediated HCV Eradication in a Cohort of HIV/HCV Coinfected Patients: Monocentric Italian Experience.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCD4+ lymphocyte cell count represents the main immunological marker used to monitor HIV infection. However, frequent monitoring may be unnecessary, could cause anxiety to the patient as well as burdening healthcare with extra expenses. OBJECTIVES AND
methodsA two-step retrospective (safety and cost-saving) analysis was performed to evaluate the probability of maintaining a safe number of more than 350 CD4+ cells/μl in HIV-positive subjects under treatment during a three-year follow up and secondarily to estimate in
resultsIn the safety analysis, 253 subjects were enrolled. The median CD4+ count was 623 (489-805) cells/μl. Subjects maintaining ≥ 350 cells/μl in the first, second, and third year were respectively 238 (94.1%), 229 (90.5%), and 226 (89.3%), independently from VL. Within subjects with ≥ 350 CD4+/μl vs. ≥ 500 CD4+/μl at baseline, those who maintained ≥ 350 cells/μl until the third year were respectively 241 (95.3%) and 158 (98.1%). The probability of maintaining these values in the third year was 89.3% for those who had CD4+ ≥ 350/μl at baseline and 98.1% for those who had CD4+ ≥ 500/μl. This probability was around 90% vs. 99% for subjects with HIV-RNA above or below 20 copies/ml. In the real-life cost saving analysis, we evaluated subjects with a stable value or more than 500 CD4+ (respectively 343, 364 and 383 in the first, second and third period). We observed mean value of about two determinations patient/year (2.41 in 2013/2014; 2.32 in 2014/2015; 2.18 in 2015/2016), with a significant decrease between the first and the last period (p<0.001). The mean cost patient/year was €101.51 in the first year, €97.61 in the second, €92.00 in the third (p<0,001). Assuming to extend these procedures to all our patients with stable CD4+ cells/μl and monitoring CD4+ cell count once in a year, we were able to obtain an overall saving of €19,152/year.
conclusionsA very high percentage of subjects maintained a high and safe number of CD4+ cells (>350 cells/μl) during a three-year follow-up. It could be possible to save up to 66% of the costs by reducing the number of CD4+ count determinations in a year, to have other favorable consequences as well, releasing new resources for patient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.