ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2019
The impact of restorative material and ceramic thickness on CAD\CAM endocrowns.
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fracture Strength of CAD/CAM Endocrown and Post-Core Restorations with Fiber Strip Reinforcement in Mandibular Premolars.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM-fabricated PMMA, PEEK, and PEKK three-unit provisional fixed dental prostheses: an in vitro comparative study.Biomaterial investigations in dentistry · 2026Article
- Article
- Fracture behavior of endodontically treated premolar teeth restored with different lithium silicate-based endocrown restorations.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Effect of Incisal Height on Fracture Resistance of Lithium Disilicate and Hybrid Ceramic Laminate Veneers.International journal of dentistry · 2025Article
- Effect of pulp-chamber lateral wall thickness and number on fracture resistance in endocrown-restored molars: An in vitro study.Journal of dental sciences · 2025Article
- Application of one-piece endodontic crowns fabricated with CAD-CAM system to molars.The Japanese dental science review · 2024Review
- Biomechanics of Central Incisor Endocrowns with Different Lengths and Milled Materials after Static and Vertical Loading: A Finite Element Study.International journal of dentistry · 2024Article
- Article
- Effect of occlusal anatomy of CAD/CAM feldspathic posterior crowns in the stress concentration and fracture load.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2021Article
- Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Endocrown Biomechanical Response According to Different Pulp Chamber Extension Angles and Filling Materials.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Effect of Restorative Material on Mechanical Response of Provisional Endocrowns: A 3D-FEA Study.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Effect of different restorative crown design and materials on stress distribution in endodontically treated molars: a finite element analysis study.BMC oral health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndocrown restorations as a conservative approach to restore endodontically treated teeth still need MATERIAL AND
methodsSixty (60) third molar teeth received an endocrown preparation with three different heights of remaining dental tissue (1.5, 3.0 or 4.5 mm). A leucite-based ceramic (LEU) and a lithium disilicate (LD) based ceramic were selected to manufacture the CAD/CAM endocrown restorations, totaling 6 groups (n=10). The specimens were subjected to fatigue loading (200N, 2 x 106 cycles, water) and then to the single load to failure test (1 mm/min crosshead speed). Data were analyzed by using two-way ANOVA and Tukey tests (
resultsAll endocrowns survived the fatigue test. The thickness did not influence the restoration's fracture load (
conclusionsEndocrowns manufactured with CAD/CAM lithium disilicate blocks showed superior fracture load than the leucite-based blocks after mechanical fatigue. Nevertheless, both materials presented acceptable survival and fracture load as long as the material's minimum thickness and the enamel adhesion are respected.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.