Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31700257›Full record

ArticleJournal of ginseng research2019

Simultaneous determination and difference evaluation of 14 ginsenosides in

Yang Xiu, Xue Li, Xiuli Sun, Dan Xiao, Rui Miao, Huanxi Zhao, Shuying Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ginseng research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Recent trends in ginseng research.Journal of natural medicines · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Quantitative and Differential Analysis betweenMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Genetic and molecular dissection of ginseng (Frontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yang XiuJilin Ginseng Academy, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, China.
Xue LiJilin Ginseng Academy, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, China.
Xiuli SunJilin Ginseng Academy, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, China.
Dan XiaoChangchun University of Technology, Changchun, China.
Rui MiaoJilin Ginseng Academy, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, China.
Huanxi ZhaoJilin Ginseng Academy, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, China.
Shuying LiuJilin Ginseng Academy, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGinsenosides are not only the principal bioactive components but also the important indexes to the quality assessment of

methodsA high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled with triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (MS) method was developed and used in the multiple reaction-monitoring (MRM) mode (HPLC-MRM/MS) for the quantitative analysis of ginsenosides. Multivariate statistical analysis, such as principal component analysis and partial least squares-discriminant analysis, was applied to discriminate ginseng samples of various cultivation areas and ages and to discover the differentially accumulated ginsenoside markers.

resultsThe developed HPLC-MRM/MS method was validated to be precise, accurate, stable, sensitive, and repeatable for the simultaneous determination of 14 ginsenosides. It was found that the 3- and 5-yr-old ginseng samples were differentiated distinctly by all means of multivariate statistical analysis, whereas the 4-yr-old samples exhibited similarity to either 3- or 5-yr-old samples in the contents of ginsenosides. Among the 14 detected ginsenosides, Rg1, Rb1, Rb2, Rc, 20(S)-Rf, 20(S)-Rh1, and Rb3 were identified as potential markers for the differentiation of cultivation ages. In addition, the 5-yr-old samples were able to be classified in cultivation area based on the contents of ginsenosides, whereas the 3- and 4-yr-old samples showed little differences in cultivation area.

conclusionThis study demonstrated that the HPLC-MRM/MS method combined with multivariate statistical analysis provides deep insight into the accumulation characteristics of ginsenosides and could be used to differentiate ginseng that are cultivated in different areas and ages.

Indexed as

Cultivation area and ageGinsenosideHigh-performance liquid chromatography coupled with triple quadrupole mass spectrometer in the multiple reaction–monitoring modeMultivariate statistical analysisPanax ginseng

Identifiers

PMID31700257
PMCPMC6823800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.