ArticleBiomedical informatics insights2019
A Data-Driven Approach to Predicting Septic Shock in the Intensive Care Unit.
Article in Biomedical informatics insights, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Predictive Modeling for Early Detection of Sepsis in Hospitalized Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Critical care explorations · 2025Pooled it
- Evaluating the generalisability of LiSep LSTM for early prediction of septic shock across US and european cohorts.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence based predictive models for early sepsis detection in intensive care units: a scoping review.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence based multispecialty mortality prediction models for septic shock in a multicenter retrospective study.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Personalized, disease-stage specific, rapid identification of immunosuppression in sepsis.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Development of continuous warning system for timely prediction of septic shock.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Article
- Machine Learning-Based Early Prediction of Sepsis Using Electronic Health Records: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Dynamic Prediction of Patient Outcomes in the Intensive Care Unit: A Scoping Review of the State-of-the-Art.Journal of intensive care medicine · 2023Article
- Performance effectiveness of vital parameter combinations for early warning of sepsis-an exhaustive study using machine learning.JAMIA open · 2022Article
- Comparative Analyses of the Impact of Different Criteria for Sepsis Diagnosis on Outcome in Patients with Spontaneous Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Gradient Importance Learning for Incomplete Observations.... International Conference on Learning Representations · 2022Article
- A predictive algorithm using clinical and laboratory parameters may assist in ruling out and in diagnosing MDS.Blood advances · 2021Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Decision Support in Sepsis.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Review
- Article
- Early Detection of Sepsis With Machine Learning Techniques: A Brief Clinical Perspective.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Continuous and automatic mortality risk prediction using vital signs in the intensive care unit: a hybrid neural network approach.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Neural Networks to Predict Radiographic Brain Injury in Pediatric Patients Treated with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Rethinking animal models of sepsis - working towards improved clinical translation whilst integrating the 3Rs.Clinical science (London, England : 1979) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early diagnosis of sepsis and septic shock has been unambiguously linked to lower mortality and better patient outcomes. Despite this, there is a strong unmet need for a reliable clinical tool that can be used for large-scale automated screening to identify high-risk patients. We addressed the following questions: Can a novel algorithm to identify patients at high risk of septic shock 24 hours before diagnosis be discovered using available clinical data? What are performance characteristics of this predictive algorithm? Can current metrics for evaluation of sepsis be improved using novel algorithm? Publicly available data from the intensive care unit setting was used to build septic shock and control patient cohorts. Using Bayesian networks, causal relationships between diagnosis groups, procedure groups, laboratory results, and demographic data were inferred. Predictive model for septic shock 24 hours prior to digital diagnosis was built based on inferred causal networks. Sepsis risk scores were augmented by de novo inferred model and performance was evaluated. A novel predictive model to identify high-risk patients 24 hours ahead of time, with area under curve of 0.81, negative predictive value of 0.87, and a positive predictive value as high as 0.65 was built. The specificity of quick sequential organ failure assessment, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, and modified early warning score was improved when augmented with the novel model, whereas no improvements were made to the sequential organ failure assessment score. We used a data-driven, expert knowledge agnostic method to build a screening algorithm for early detection of septic shock. The model demonstrates strong performance in the data set used and provides a basis for expanding this work toward building an algorithm that is used to screen patients based on electronic medical record data in real time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.