Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31700208›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2019

Circular external fixation as definitive treatment for open or comminuted femoral fractures: Radiologic and functional outcomes.

Giovanni Lovisetti, Rajesh Rohilla, Karan Siwach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. An engineering review of external fixators.Medical engineering & physics · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Giovanni LovisettiSenior Consultant, Orthopaedics and Traumatology Unit of the Menaggio Hospital, Italy.
Rajesh RohillaSenior Professor. Pt B D Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India.
Karan SiwachSenior Resident. Pt B D Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India.
Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences · INCTO Hospital · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRing external fixation can be a definitive treatment of high energy femoral fractures. A retrospective analysis of outcomes is presented. MATERIALS AND

methods23 patients with open or comminuted femoral fractures treated with circular external fixators were included. Mean age was 33 (range, 13-81) years. Lesions were classified according to AO/ASIF. 12 fractures were open. Mean follow up period has been 26.3, (range 20-144) months. The results were assessed according to the modified criteria of Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov. Knee functional results were assessed with Hospital for Special Surgery knee scoring system.

results22 fractures united primarily, one showed nonunion. Knee stiffness developed in two patients. No patient had deep pin tract infection. Bone results were quoted as excellent, good, fair and poor in 19, 1, 1 and 2. The functional results were excellent, good, and fair in 16, 6, and 1, on the basis of ASAMI criteria. Mean HSS knee score has been 90.1 (range 60-100).

conclusionCircular external fixation can achieve reliable rates of union and good to excellent functional outcome in open or comminuted femoral fractures. A strict rehabilitation protocol was effective in preserving knee joint function.

Indexed as

Circular fixatorComminutedDistal femurExternal fixationFemoral fractureFemurIlizarov fixatorOpenRing fixator

Identifiers

PMID31700208
PMCPMC6823893
OpenAlexW2926679257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.