Trial reportScientific reports2019
Functional neuroanatomy of interoceptive processing in children and adolescents: a pilot study.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Interoception in self-harm and suicide: a scoping review and meta-analysis.Nature human behaviour · 2026Pooled it
- Interoception in individuals with autism spectrum disorder: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Role of Institutionalization in Interoception, Emotion Regulation, and Prosocial Behavior in Preschool Children.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Interoception in Adolescence: Impacts on Mental Health and Adaptive Functioning.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2025Review
- Body Aware: Adolescents' and Young Adults' Lived Experiences of Body Awareness.Psychologica Belgica · 2024Article
- Interoceptive brain network mechanisms of mindfulness-based training in healthy adolescents.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Action Understanding Promoted by Interoception in Children: A Developmental Model.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Review
- A pediatric near-infrared spectroscopy brain-computer interface based on the detection of emotional valence.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: A review.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2021Review
- An Embodied Cognition Perspective on the Role of Interoception in the Development of the Minimal Self.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In adults, interoception - the sense of the physiological condition of the body - appears to influence emotion processing, cognition, behavior and various somatic and mental health disorders. Adults demonstrate frontal-insula-parietal-anterior cingulate cortex activation during the heartbeat detection task, a common interoceptive measure. Little, however, is known about the functional neuroanatomy underlying interoception in children. The current pilot study examined interoceptive processing in children and adolescents with fMRI while using the heartbeat detection task. Our main findings demonstrate that children as young as the age of six activate the left insula, cuneus, inferior parietal lobule and prefrontal regions. These findings are similar to those in adults when comparing heartbeat and tone detection conditions. Age was associated with increased activation within the dACC, orbital frontal cortex and the mid-inferior frontal gyri. Thus, our pilot study may provide important information about the neurodevelopment of interoceptive processing abilities in children and a task for future interoception neuroimaging studies in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.