Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31699888›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2019

Exposing Pathological Sensory Predictions in Tinnitus Using Auditory Intensity Deviant Evoked Responses.

William Sedley, Kai Alter, Phillip E Gander, Joel Berger, Timothy D Griffiths

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. What Do Mismatch Negativity (MMN) Responses Tell Us About Tinnitus?Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Eavesdropping on Tinnitus Using MEG: Lessons Learned and Future Perspectives.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. [Research progress in auditory center plasticity and tinnitus mechanism].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

William SedleyNewcastle University Medical School, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom, and william.sedley@newcastle.ac.uk.
Kai AlterNewcastle University Medical School, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom, and.
Phillip E GanderHuman Brain Research Laboratory, University of Iowa, Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa 52242.
Joel BergerHuman Brain Research Laboratory, University of Iowa, Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa 52242.
Timothy D GriffithsNewcastle University Medical School, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom, and.ORCID 0000-0001-8066-4381
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics · USNewcastle University · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We tested the popular, unproven theory that tinnitus is caused by resetting of auditory predictions toward a persistent low-intensity sound. Electroencephalographic mismatch negativity responses, which quantify the violation of sensory predictions, to unattended tinnitus-like sounds were greater in response to upward than downward intensity deviants in 26 unselected chronic tinnitus subjects with normal to severely impaired hearing, and in 15 acute tinnitus subjects, but not in 26 hearing and age-matched controls (

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAdultAgedAuditory PerceptionElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, AuditoryFemaleHearing LossHumansMaleMiddle AgedTinnitusbiomarkerelectroencephalographymismatch negativityphantom perceptionpredictive codingtinnitus

Identifiers

PMID31699888
PMCPMC6978936
OpenAlexW2987084238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.