Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31699887›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2020

Hippocampal and Prefrontal Theta-Band Mechanisms Underpin Implicit Spatial Context Learning.

Eelke Spaak, Floris P de Lange

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Theta Signal Transfer from Parietal to Prefrontal Cortex Ignites Conscious Awareness of Implicit Knowledge during Sequence Learning.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  7. Expected distractor context biases the attentional template for target shapes.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eelke SpaakRadboud University Nijmegen, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, 6525 EN, Nijmegen, The Netherlands e.spaak@donders.ru.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-2018-3364
Floris P de LangeRadboud University Nijmegen, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, 6525 EN, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6730-1452

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans can rapidly and seemingly implicitly learn to predict typical locations of relevant items when those items are encountered in familiar spatial contexts. Two important questions remain, however, concerning this type of learning: (1) which neural structures and mechanisms are involved in acquiring and exploiting such contextual knowledge? (2) Is this type of learning truly implicit and unconscious? We now answer both these questions after closely examining behavior and recording neural activity using MEG while observers (male and female) were acquiring and exploiting statistical regularities. Computational modeling of behavioral data suggested that, after repeated exposures to a spatial context, participants' behavior was marked by an abrupt switch to an exploitation strategy of the learnt regularities. MEG recordings showed that hippocampus and prefrontal cortex (PFC) were involved in the task and furthermore revealed a striking dissociation: only the initial learning phase was associated with hippocampal theta band activity, while the subsequent exploitation phase showed a shift in theta band activity to the PFC. Intriguingly, the behavioral benefit of repeated exposures to certain scenes was inversely related to explicit awareness of such repeats, demonstrating the implicit nature of the expectations acquired. Together, these findings demonstrate that (1a) hippocampus and PFC play complementary roles in the implicit, unconscious learning and exploitation of spatial statistical regularities; (1b) these mechanisms are implemented in the theta frequency band; and (2) contextual knowledge can indeed be acquired unconsciously, and awareness of such knowledge can even interfere with the exploitation thereof.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBayes TheoremComputer SimulationCuesFemaleHippocampusHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetoencephalographyMaleMiddle AgedModels, NeurologicalPattern Recognition, VisualPrefrontal CortexSpatial Learningcontextual cueinghippocampusimplicit learningmagnetoencephalographytheta rhythmvisual search

Identifiers

PMID31699887
PMCPMC6939492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.