Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31699750›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Quality of patient, family, caregiver and public engagement in decision-making in healthcare systems: a scoping review protocol.

Clayon Hamilton, M Elizabeth Snow, Nancy Clark, Shannon Gibson, Maryam Dehnadi, Michelle Lui, Andrew Koster, Janet McLean, Linda C Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Clayon HamiltonArthritis Research Centre of Canada, Richmond, British Columbia, Canada chamilton@arthritisresearch.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-6852-3436
M Elizabeth SnowProgram Evaluation, Centre for Health Evaluation & Outcome Sciences, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Nancy ClarkFaculty of Human and Social Development, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Shannon GibsonPrimary Care Division, British Columbia Ministry of Health, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Maryam DehnadiFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
Michelle LuiSchool of Population & Public Health, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Andrew KosterPatient partner, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Janet McLeanFamily Caregivers of British Columbia, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Linda C LiDepartment of Physical Therapy, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6280-0511

Funding

CIHR GSR-154442
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo advance person- and family-centred healthcare, government initiatives have supported the engagement of patients and family caregivers in decision-making in healthcare systems. There is, however, no consensus on how to define success for such initiatives. This scoping review aims to identify the key elements for defining the quality of patient and family caregiver engagement in decision-making across the engagement domains (individual, community/organisation, system) of British Columbia's healthcare system. We will use those elements to develop a conceptual evaluation framework. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This scoping review follows Arskey and O'Malley's methodology. (1) The research question was identified through team discussions. (2) Articles for data source will be identified using a librarian-informed search strategy for seven bibliographic databases as well as grey literature sources. (3) Selected articles will be relevant to the evaluation of patient and family caregiver engagement in healthcare systems. (4) Two researchers will independently extract data into predefined and emerging categories. (5) The researchers will reconcile and organise the identified elements. The research team's collective perspective will then refine the elements, and select, interpret and summarise the results. (6) Persons from key stakeholder groups will be consulted to refine the emergent conceptual framework. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: We will seek ethics approval for the stakeholder consultation. This study follows an integrated knowledge translation approach. The results will inform evaluation of the Patients as Partners Initiative of the British Columbia Ministry of Health, and will be disseminated as a scientific article, a research brief, and presentations at conferences and stakeholder meetings.

Indexed as

Decision Making, SharedPatient ParticipationBritish ColumbiaCaregiversDelivery of Health CareFamilyHumansPatient-Centered CareScoping Reviews as Topicdecision-makingpatient and public engagementpatient participationquality of health care

Identifiers

PMID31699750
PMCPMC6858224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.