Observational studyBMJ open2019
Patient-physician discordance in assessment of adherence to inhaled controller medication: a cross-sectional analysis of two cohorts.
Observational study in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating Treatment Adherence in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes: The Impact of the Adherence Starts with Knowledge-12 Score on Metabolic Control.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Nurse-Led Interventions for Improving Medication Adherence in Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Management of difficult-to-treat asthma in adolescence and young adults.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2023Review
- Measuring adherence to inhaled control medication in patients with asthma: Comparison among an asthma app, patient self-report and physician assessment.Clinical and translational allergy · 2023Article
- Medication beliefs, adherence, and outcomes in people with asthma: The importance of treatment beliefs in understanding inhaled corticosteroid nonadherence-a retrospective analysis of a real-world data set.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2023Article
- Prevalence and Characterisation of Patients with Asthma According to Disease Severity in Portugal: Findings from the EPI-ASTHMA Pilot Study.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2022Article
- Characteristics of Oral Corticosteroid Users Among Persons with Asthma on GINA Step 3 Therapy and Above: A Cross-Sectional Study in Portuguese Community Pharmacies.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2022Article
- Validating a Self-Reported Medication Nonadherence Measure in the Context of Multiple Chronic Diseases and Routes of Medication Administration Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.Patient preference and adherence · 2022Article
- Determinants of the Use of Health and Fitness Mobile Apps by Patients With Asthma: Secondary Analysis of Observational Studies.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- InspirerMundi-Remote Monitoring of Inhaled Medication Adherence through Objective Verification Based on Combined Image Processing Techniques.Methods of information in medicine · 2021Article
- Feasibility and Acceptability of an Asthma App to Monitor Medication Adherence: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2021Observational
- Assessment of medication adherence in children and adults with congenital adrenal hyperplasia and the impact of knowledge and self-management.Clinical endocrinology · 2021Article
- Profiling Persistent Asthma Phenotypes in Adolescents: A Longitudinal Diagnostic Evaluation from the INSPIRERS Studies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Development and Pilot-Testing of Key Questions to Identify Patients' Difficulties in Medication Administration.Patient preference and adherence · 2021Article
- Monitoring Adherence to Asthma Inhalers Using the InspirerMundi App: Analysis of Real-World, Medium-Term Feasibility Studies.Frontiers in medical technology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
70 authors at 20 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe aimed to compare patient's and physician's ratings of inhaled medication adherence and to identify predictors of patient-physician discordance.
designBaseline data from two prospective multicentre observational studies.
setting29 allergy, pulmonology and paediatric secondary care outpatient clinics in Portugal.
participants395 patients (≥13 years old) with persistent asthma. MEASURES: Data on demographics, patient-physician relationship, upper airway control, asthma control, asthma treatment, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV
resultsHigh inhaler adherence was reported both by patients (median (percentile 25 to percentile 75) 85 (65-95) mm; 53% VAS>80) and by physicians (84 (68-95) mm; 53% VAS>80). Correlation between patient and physician VAS scores was moderate (r
conclusionAlthough both patients and physicians report high inhaler adherence, discordance occurred in half of cases. Implementation of objective adherence measures and effective communication are needed to improve patient-physician agreement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.