Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31699144›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2019

Microbial communities of the house fly Musca domestica vary with geographical location and habitat.

Rahel Park, Maria C Dzialo, Stijn Spaepen, Donat Nsabimana, Kim Gielens, Herman Devriese, Sam Crauwels, Raul Y Tito, Jeroen Raes, Bart Lievens and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rahel ParkVIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, Gaston Geenslaan 1, 3001, Leuven, Belgium.
Maria C DzialoVIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, Gaston Geenslaan 1, 3001, Leuven, Belgium.
Stijn SpaepenCMPG Laboratory of Genetics and Genomics, Department M2S, KU Leuven, Gaston Geenslaan 1, 3001, Leuven, Belgium.
Donat NsabimanaBiology Department, School of Science, College of Science and technology, University of Rwanda, RN1, Butare, Rwanda.
Kim GielensVIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, Gaston Geenslaan 1, 3001, Leuven, Belgium.
Herman DevrieseSafety, Health & Environment Department, UZ Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Sam CrauwelsLeuven Institute for Beer Research (LIBR), Gaston Geenslaan 1, 3001, Leuven, Belgium.
Raul Y TitoVIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, Gaston Geenslaan 1, 3001, Leuven, Belgium.
Jeroen RaesVIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, Gaston Geenslaan 1, 3001, Leuven, Belgium.
Bart LievensLeuven Institute for Beer Research (LIBR), Gaston Geenslaan 1, 3001, Leuven, Belgium.
Kevin J VerstrepenVIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, Gaston Geenslaan 1, 3001, Leuven, Belgium. kevin.verstrepen@kuleuven.vib.be.ORCID 0000-0002-3077-6219

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

House flies (Musca domestica) are widespread, synanthropic filth flies commonly found on decaying matter, garbage, and feces as well as human food. They have been shown to vector microbes, including clinically relevant pathogens. Previous studies have demonstrated that house flies carry a complex and variable prokaryotic microbiota, but the main drivers underlying this variability and the influence of habitat on the microbiota remain understudied. Moreover, the differences between the external and internal microbiota and the eukaryotic components have not been examined. To obtain a comprehensive view of the fly microbiota and its environmental drivers, we sampled over 400 flies from two geographically distinct countries (Belgium and Rwanda) and three different environments-farms, homes, and hospitals. Both the internal as well as external microbiota of the house flies were studied, using amplicon sequencing targeting both bacteria and fungi. Results show that the house fly's internal bacterial community is very diverse yet relatively consistent across geographic location and habitat, dominated by genera Staphylococcus and Weissella. The external bacterial community, however, varies with geographic location and habitat. The fly fungal microbiota carries a distinct signature correlating with the country of sampling, with order Capnodiales and genus Wallemia dominating Belgian flies and genus Cladosporium dominating Rwandan fly samples. Together, our results reveal an intricate country-specific pattern for fungal communities, a relatively stable internal bacterial microbiota and a variable external bacterial microbiota that depends on geographical location and habitat. These findings suggest that vectoring of a wide spectrum of environmental microbes occurs principally through the external fly body surface, while the internal microbiome is likely more limited by fly physiology.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaPhylogeographyAnimalsBacteriaBelgiumHousefliesRwanda

Identifiers

PMID31699144
PMCPMC6839111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.