Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31699115›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2019

Comparison of the outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy versus surgical treatment for elderly (≥70) patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer after propensity score matching.

Baiqiang Dong, Jin Wang, Xuan Zhu, Yuanyuan Chen, Yujin Xu, Kainan Shao, Lei Zheng, Hangjie Ying, Ming Chen, Jianping Cao

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Journal of thoracic disease · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Application Value of Evidence-Based Care in Patients with Lung Cancer Chemotherapy.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic LobectomyFrontiers in oncology · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Baiqiang DongSchool of Radiation Medicine and Protection, State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Radiation Protection, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215123, China.
Jin WangInstitute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (ICBM), Chinese Academy of Sciences; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences; Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310011, China.
Xuan ZhuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310003, China.
Yuanyuan ChenInstitute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (ICBM), Chinese Academy of Sciences; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences; Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310011, China.
Yujin XuInstitute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (ICBM), Chinese Academy of Sciences; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences; Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310011, China.
Kainan ShaoInstitute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (ICBM), Chinese Academy of Sciences; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences; Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310011, China.
Lei ZhengInstitute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (ICBM), Chinese Academy of Sciences; Department of Thoracic Oncology Surgery, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences; Department of Thoracic Oncology Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310011, China.
Hangjie YingInstitute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (ICBM), Chinese Academy of Sciences; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences; Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310011, China.
Ming ChenSchool of Radiation Medicine and Protection, State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Radiation Protection, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215123, China. chenming@zjcc.org.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2570-0858
Jianping CaoSchool of Radiation Medicine and Protection, State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Radiation Protection, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215123, China. jpcao@suda.edu.cn.
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNSoochow University · CNZhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe optimal treatment for elderly patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains inconclusive. Previous studies have shown that stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) provides encouraging local control though higher incidence of toxicity in elderly than younger populations. The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of SBRT and surgical treatment in elderly patients with clinical stage I-II NSCLC.

methodsThis retrospective analysis included 205 patients aged ≥70 years with clinical stage I NSCLC who underwent SBRT or surgery at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital (Hangzhou, China) from January 2012 to December 2017. A propensity score matching analysis was performed between the two groups. In addition, we compared outcomes and related toxicity in both study arms.

resultsEach group included 35 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Median follow-up was 50.1 (0.8-74.4) months for surgery and 35.5 (11.5-71.4) months for SBRT. The rate of cancer-specific survival was similar between the two treatment arms (p = 0.958). In patients who underwent surgery, the corresponding 3- and 5-year cancer-specific survival rates were 85.3 and 81.7%, respectively. In those who received radiotherapy, these rates were 91.3 and 74.9%, respectively. Moreover, the 3- and 5-year locoregional control in patients who underwent surgery were 90.0 and 80.0%, respectively. In those who received radiotherapy, these rates were 91.1 and 84.1%, respectively. Notably, the observed differences in progression-free survival were not statistically significant (p = 0.934). In the surgery group, grade 1-2 complications were observed in eleven patients (31%). One patient died due to perioperative infection within 30 days following surgery. There was no grade 3-5 toxicity observed in the SBRT group.

conclusionsThe outcomes of surgery and SBRT in elderly patients with early-stage NSCLC were similar.

Indexed as

RadiosurgeryAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungComparative Effectiveness ResearchFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLung NeoplasmsMalePrevalencePropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesSmall Cell Lung CarcinomaTreatment OutcomeAdvanced ageEarly-stage non-small cell lung cancerRadical resection of lung cancerStereotactic body radiotherapyToxicityTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID31699115
PMCPMC6839130
OpenAlexW2984486098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.