Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31699045›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2019

Standardized warfarin monitoring decreases adverse drug reactions.

Lisa B E Shields, Paula Fowler, Diane M Siemens, Douglas J Lorenz, Kenneth C Wilson, Steven T Hester, Joshua T Honaker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Electronic health record-enabled routine assessment of medication adherence after solid organ transplantation: the time is now.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa B E ShieldsNorton Neuroscience Institute, Norton Healthcare, 210 East Gray Street, Suite 1102, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA. LBES@earthlink.net.ORCID 0000-0002-1526-4063
Paula FowlerNorton Medical Group, Norton Healthcare, 4801 Olympia Park Plaza, Suite 3000, Louisville, KY, 40241, USA.
Diane M SiemensNorton Medical Group, Norton Healthcare, 4801 Olympia Park Plaza, Suite 3000, Louisville, KY, 40241, USA.
Douglas J LorenzDepartment of Bioinformatics & Biostatistics, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 40292, USA.
Kenneth C WilsonNorton Medical Group, Norton Healthcare, 4801 Olympia Park Plaza, Suite 3000, Louisville, KY, 40241, USA.
Steven T HesterNorton Medical Group, Norton Healthcare, 4801 Olympia Park Plaza, Suite 3000, Louisville, KY, 40241, USA.
Joshua T HonakerNorton Medical Group, Norton Healthcare, 4801 Olympia Park Plaza, Suite 3000, Louisville, KY, 40241, USA.
Norton Healthcare · USUniversity of Louisville · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile warfarin is the most commonly prescribed medication to prevent thromboembolic disorders, the risk of adverse drug reactions (ADR) poses a serious concern. This prospective study evaluated how primary care providers (PCP) and cardiologists at our Institution managed patients treated with warfarin with the goal of decreasing the number of warfarin ADRs.

methodsA multidisciplinary anticoagulation task force was established at our Institution in 2014 to standardize warfarin monitoring and management. Between 2013 and 2017, we analyzed patients who were prescribed warfarin by their PCP or cardiologist upon hospital discharge and in the ambulatory setting to determine the international normalized ratio (INR) within 5, 10, and 30 days after discharge, time in therapeutic range (TTR), number of severe warfarin ADRs, and total and average cost reduction of all severe warfarin ADRs to determine whether there was an organizational cost savings following the implementation of standardized warfarin care.

resultsThe warfarin ADR rate significantly decreased over the 5-year period, from 3.8 to 0.98% (p < 0.0001). The proportion of warfarin prescriptions out of all anticoagulants significantly decreased, from 72.2 to 42.1% (p < 0.001). The proportion of individuals who received an INR at 5, 10, and 30 days after hospital discharge compared to the total number of patients prescribed warfarin significantly increased (p < 0.001). The total cost of severe warfarin ADRs decreased by 57.6% between 2013 and 2017.

conclusionsThis study serves as a model to reduce the number of severe warfarin ADRs by the following tactics: (1) educating PCPs and cardiologists about evidence-based guidelines for warfarin management, (2) increasing the use of our Institution's electronic warfarin module, and (3) enhancing patient compliance with obtaining INR.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHumansInternational Normalized RatioPatient CompliancePhysicians, FamilyProspective StudiesWarfarinAnticoagulantsWarfarinAdverse drug reactionCardiologistFamily practicePrimary care providerWarfarin

Identifiers

PMID31699045
PMCPMC6836368
OpenAlexW2985992144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.