Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31699036›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2019

Hecaton: reliably detecting copy number variation in plant genomes using short read sequencing data.

Raúl Y Wijfjes, Sandra Smit, Dick de Ridder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Benchmarking strategies for CNV calling from whole genome bisulfite data in humans.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Raúl Y WijfjesBioinformatics Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands. raul.wijfjes@wur.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0806-2911
Sandra SmitBioinformatics Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5239-5321
Dick de RidderBioinformatics Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4944-4310

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek ALWGR.2015.9
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCopy number variation (CNV) is thought to actively contribute to adaptive evolution of plant species. While many computational algorithms are available to detect copy number variation from whole genome sequencing datasets, the typical complexity of plant data likely introduces false positive calls.

resultsTo enable reliable and comprehensive detection of CNV in plant genomes, we developed Hecaton, a novel computational workflow tailored to plants, that integrates calls from multiple state-of-the-art algorithms through a machine-learning approach. In this paper, we demonstrate that Hecaton outperforms current methods when applied to short read sequencing data of Arabidopsis thaliana, rice, maize, and tomato. Moreover, it correctly detects dispersed duplications, a type of CNV commonly found in plant species, in contrast to several state-of-the-art tools that erroneously represent this type of CNV as overlapping deletions and tandem duplications. Finally, Hecaton scales well in terms of memory usage and running time when applied to short read datasets of domesticated and wild tomato accessions.

conclusionsHecaton provides a robust method to detect CNV in plants. We expect it to be of immediate interest to both applied and fundamental research on the relationship between genotype and phenotype in plants.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsSequence Analysis, DNASoftwareGene DuplicationGenome, PlantGenomicsWorkflowCopy number variationMachine learningPlant adaptationStructural variation

Identifiers

PMID31699036
PMCPMC6836508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.