Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31698761›Full record

ReviewPolymers2019

Functional Metal Organic Framework/SiO

Mengyu Ma, Liangyu Lu, Hongwei Li, Yuzhu Xiong, Fuping Dong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Mesoporous Silica-Supported MOF Composites for CONanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mengyu MaDepartment of Polymer Materials and Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China.
Liangyu LuDepartment of Polymer Materials and Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China.
Hongwei LiDepartment of Polymer Materials and Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China.
Yuzhu XiongDepartment of Polymer Materials and Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China.
Fuping DongDepartment of Polymer Materials and Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China.

Funding

Guizhou Science and Technology Department [2019]1092, 2016123, and GZU201625National Natural Science Foundation of China 51663003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metal organic frameworks (MOFs), also called porous coordination polymers, have attracted extensive attention as molecular-level organic-inorganic hybrid supramolecular solid materials bridged by metal ions/clusters and organic ligands. Given their advantages, such as their high specific surface area, high porosity, and open active metal sites, MOFs offer great potential for gas storage, adsorption, catalysis, pollute removal, and biomedicine. However, the relatively weak stability and poor mechanical property of most MOFs have limited the practical application of such materials. Recently, the combination of MOFs with inorganic materials has been found to provide a possible strategy to solve such limitations. Silica, which has excellent chemical stability and mechanical properties, shows great advantages in compounding with MOFs to improve their properties and performance. It not only provides structured support for MOF materials but also improves the stability of materials through hydrophobic interaction or covalent bonding. This review summarizes the fabrication strategy, structural characteristics, and applications of MOF/silica composites, focusing on their application in chromatographic column separation, catalysis, biomedicine, and adsorption. The challenges of the application of MOF/SiO

Indexed as

biomedicinecatalysischromatographic column separationgas adsorptionmetal organic frameworkssilica

Identifiers

PMID31698761
PMCPMC6918186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.