Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31698462›Full record

ArticleBlood advances2019

Blast phenotype and comutations in acute myeloid leukemia with mutated NPM1 influence disease biology and outcome.

Emily F Mason, Robert P Hasserjian, Nidhi Aggarwal, Adam C Seegmiller, Olga Pozdnyakova

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Blood advances, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. APL-like subset withinHemaSphere · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Prognostic relevance ofAmerican journal of blood research · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Emily F MasonDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Robert P HasserjianDepartment of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Nidhi AggarwalDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; and.
Adam C SeegmillerDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Olga PozdnyakovaDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent work has identified distinct molecular subgroups of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with implications for disease classification and prognosis. AML with mutated NPM1 (AML-NPM1) represents a distinct entity in the revised 2017 World Health Organization classification, but relatively little work has examined the clinical significance of phenotypic and genetic heterogeneity within this group. A multi-institutional cohort of 239 AML-NPM1 cases included 3 phenotypic groups: cases with blasts showing monocytic differentiation (n = 93; monocytic AML-NPM1), cases lacking monocytic differentiation (n = 72; myeloid AML-NPM1), and cases where blasts were negative for both CD34 and HLA-DR (n = 74; double-negative [DN] AML-NPM1). Genotypic diversity typical of AML-NPM1 was seen, with comutations occurring most commonly in DNA methylation genes (81% of cases), FLT3 (48%; including internal tandem duplication and tyrosine kinase domain mutations), and RAS pathway genes (30%). However, the comutation pattern differed by blast phenotype. TET2 and IDH1/2 mutations were significantly more common in DN AML-NPM1 (96% of cases) than in myeloid (39%) or monocytic AML-NPM1 (48%; P < .0001). Conversely, DNMT3A mutations were significantly less common in DN AML-NPM1 (27%) than in myeloid (44%) or monocytic cases (54%; P = .002). Furthermore, the 3 phenotypic groups showed significant differences in outcome, with DN AML-NPM1 showing significantly longer relapse-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) (64.7 and 66.5 months, respectively) than monocytic AML-NPM1 (RFS, 20.6 months; OS, 44.3 months) or myeloid AML-NPM1 (RFS, 8.4 months; OS, 20.2 months; P < .0001 and P = .01 for RFS and OS, respectively). Our findings highlight biologic differences within immunophenotypically defined subgroups of NPM1-mutated AML that may impart prognostic significance.

Indexed as

Genetic Association StudiesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseMutationAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersBone MarrowFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunophenotypingKaplan-Meier EstimateLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleBiomarkersNPM1 protein, humanNuclear ProteinsNucleophosmin

Identifiers

PMID31698462
PMCPMC6855116
OpenAlexW2986207059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.