ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2019
A collection input based support tensor machine for lesion malignancy classification in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) with improved lesion conspicuity and characterization has been adopted in screening practice. DBT-based diagnosis strongly depends on physicians' experience, so an automatic lesion malignancy classification model using DBT could improve the consistency of diagnosis among different physicians. Tensor-based approaches that use the original imaging data as input have shown promising results for many classification tasks. However, DBT data are pseudo-3D volumetric imaging as the slice spacing of DBT is much coarser than that of the in-plane resolution. Thus, directly constructing DBT as the third-order tensor in a conventional tensor-based classifier with introducing additional information to the original DBT data along the slice-spacing dimension will lead to inconsistency across all three dimensions. To avoid such inconsistency, we introduce a collection input based support tensor machine (CISTM)-based classifier that uses the tensor collection as input for classifying lesion malignancy in DBT. In CISTM, instead of introducing the third dimension directly into the geometry construction, the third-dimension structural relationship is related by weight parameters in the decision function, which is dynamically and automatically constructed during the classifier training process and is more consistent with the pseudo-3D nature of DBT. We tested our method on a DBT dataset of 926 images among which 262 were malignant and 664 were benign. We compared our method with the latest tensor-based method, KSTM (kernelled support tensor machine), which does not consider the unique non-uniform resolution property of DBT. Experimental results illustrate that the CISTM-based classifier is effective for classifying breast lesion malignancy in DBT and that it outperforms the KSTM-based classifier.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.