Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31698323›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2019

Cannabis use disorder among people using cannabis daily/almost daily in the United States, 2002-2016.

Julian Santaella-Tenorio, Natalie S Levy, Luis E Segura, Pia M Mauro, Silvia S Martins

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Treatment demand for cannabis use problems: analyses of routine data from 30 European countries.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julian Santaella-TenorioDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 W 168th St, New York, NY, 10032, USA. Electronic address: js4222@columbia.edu.
Natalie S LevyDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 W 168th St, New York, NY, 10032, USA. Electronic address: nsl2110@cumc.columbia.edu.
Luis E SeguraDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 W 168th St, New York, NY, 10032, USA. Electronic address: les2196@cumc.columbia.edu.
Pia M MauroDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 W 168th St, New York, NY, 10032, USA. Electronic address: pm2838@cumc.columbia.edu.
Silvia S MartinsDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 W 168th St, New York, NY, 10032, USA. Electronic address: ssm2183@cumc.columbia.edu.
Columbia University · US

Funding

State medical marijuana laws and NSDUH marijuana use and consequences since 2004R01DA037866 · NIDA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MARTINS, SILVIA SABOIA · 2014 to 2018
$2.3M
Multi-level associations between medical marijuana laws and substance use disorder treatmentK01DA045224 · NIDA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MAURO, PIA M. · 2018 to 2022
$878k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA045224NIDA NIH HHS L30 DA042436NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA037866
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCannabis use disorder (CUD) prevalence among people reporting past-year cannabis use declined from 2002-2016. We examined whether similar reductions in CUD were observed among people reporting daily/almost daily cannabis use. We expected that CUD prevalence among people reporting daily/almost daily use would not decrease.

methodsWe used 2002-2016 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) data, including 22,651 individuals using cannabis 300+ days in the past year. CUD was defined using DSM-IV criteria for cannabis abuse and/or dependence. Age categories included: 12-17, 18-25, and 26 + . Annual prevalence of CUD, cannabis dependence, cannabis abuse, and each individual abuse/dependence items accounted for the complex survey design. Differences in trends over time were examined by age group.

resultsFrom 2002-2016, the prevalence of CUD among people reporting daily/almost daily cannabis use decreased by 26.8% in adolescents, by 29.7% in ages 18-25, and by 37.5% in ages 26 + . Prevalence of DSM-IV cannabis dependence decreased significantly among adolescents (-43.9%) and young adults (-26.8%) but remained stable in adults 26 + . Reductions in most dependence items were observed in young adults, with less consistent patterns in adolescents and adults 26 + . Prevalence of DSM-IV cannabis abuse decreased overall and for each abuse item across all age groups.

conclusionsContrary to expectations, CUD prevalence decreased significantly across all ages reporting daily/almost daily cannabis use between 2002-2016. Cannabis dependence prevalence decreased for adolescents and young adults and was stable only among adults ages 26+ reporting daily/almost daily cannabis use. Potential drivers of this decrease should be further explored.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleMarijuana AbuseMarijuana SmokingPrevalenceSubstance-Related DisordersUnited StatesYoung AdultCannabisCannabis use disorderDailyDaily Cannabis useMarijuana abuseMarijuana useSubstance-related disorders

Identifiers

PMID31698323
PMCPMC7359630
OpenAlexW2980498545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.