ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2019
Associations among interpretation bias, craving, and abstinence self-efficacy in adults with substance use disorders.
Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From cognitive targets to symptom reduction: overview of attention and interpretation bias modification research.Evidence-based mental health · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveInterpretation bias is a crucial therapeutic target in emotional disorders. However, few studies have examined the role of interpretation bias in substance use disorders (SUDs). Our specific aims were: (1) to examine whether interpretation bias was associated with craving and abstinence self-efficacy, and (2) explore potential moderators of these associations, including anxiety severity, sex, and substance type.
methodsAdults attending an inpatient SUD treatment program (N = 224; mean age = 38.95; 67% male/33% female; 68% primary alcohol use disorder/29% primary opioid use disorder) completed the Word-Sentence Association Paradigm (WSAP) with ambiguous situations related to general anxiety domains (e.g., daily stress, health, relationships), as well as measures of craving (Craving Scale), abstinence self-efficacy (Brief Situational Confidence Scale), and anxiety symptoms (Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale [OASIS] and Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3).
resultsNegative interpretation bias was modestly associated with more craving (r = .23, p = .001) and less confidence to resist using substances (r = -0.23, p = .001). In multiple linear regression models that included the anxiety measures, interpretation bias was the most robust predictor of craving and abstinence self-efficacy. Sex (N = 224) and substance type (opioid vs. alcohol; n = 219) did not moderate these relationships.
conclusionsThese findings suggest that interpretation bias might be an important individual difference within SUD populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.