Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31697736›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

More than just availability: Who has access and who administers take-home naloxone in Baltimore, MD.

Lauren Dayton, Rachel E Gicquelais, Karin Tobin, Melissa Davey-Rothwell, Oluwaseun Falade-Nwulia, Xiangrong Kong, Michael Fingerhood, Abenaa A Jones, Carl Latkin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Assessing the reach and engagement with the 'Drugs (Abingdon, England) · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lauren DaytonDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1400-3670
Rachel E GicquelaisDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7022-6385
Karin TobinDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Melissa Davey-RothwellDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Oluwaseun Falade-NwuliaDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Xiangrong KongDepartment of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Michael FingerhoodDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Abenaa A JonesDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Carl LatkinDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.

Funding

Virology and Molecular Biomarkers CoreP30AI050409 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Ann M Chahroudi, Colleen F Kelley · 2002 to 2026
$74.0M
Johns Hopkins HIV Epidemiology and Prevention Sciences Training ProgramT32AI102623 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Shruti H Mehta · 2013 to 2026
$5.3M
The Effects of Drug Use, Depression, and Social Factors on HIV/HCV Care Continuum among PWID in Urban Areas: A Social-Network PerspectiveR01DA040488 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI LATKIN, CARL A, TOBIN, KARIN E · 2015 to 2020
$4.0M
The Impact of Neighborhoods, Networks and Depression on Drug Users' HIV RisksR01DA022961 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI LATKIN, CARL A · 2007 to 2011
$3.0M
The impact of social networks on hepatitis C transmission and care access in people who inject drugsK23DA041294 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FALADE-NWULIA, OLUWASEUN · 2016 to 2020
$924k
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI050409NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI102623NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA041294NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA022961NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA040488
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFatal opioid overdose is a pressing public health concern in the United States. Addressing barriers and augmenting facilitators to take-home naloxone (THN) access and administration could expand program reach in preventing fatal overdoses.

methodsTHN access (i.e., being prescribed or receiving THN) was assessed in a Baltimore, Maryland-based sample of 577 people who use opioids (PWUO) and had a history of injecting drugs. A sub-analysis examined correlates of THN administration among those with THN access and who witnessed an overdose (N = 345). Logistic generalized estimating equations with robust standard errors were used to identify facilitators and barriers to accessing and using THN.

resultsThe majority of PWUO (66%) reported THN access. In the multivariable model, decreased THN access was associated with the fear that a person may become aggressive after being revived with THN (aOR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.35-0.85), police threaten people at an overdose event (aOR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.36-1.00), and insufficient overdose training (aOR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.28-0.68). Enrollment in medication-assisted treatment, personally experiencing an overdose, and graduating from high school were associated with higher access. About half (49%) of PWUO with THN access and who had witnessed an overdose reported having administered THN. THN use was positively associated with "often" or "always" carrying THN (aOR: 3.47, 95% CI: 1.99-6.06), witnessing more overdoses (aOR:5.18, 95% CI: 2.22-12.07), experiencing recent homelessness, and injecting in the past year. THN use was reduced among participants who did not feel that they had sufficient overdose training (aOR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.32-0.96).

conclusionTHN programs must bolster confidence in administering THN and address barriers to use, such as fear of a THN recipient becoming aggressive. Normative change around carrying THN is an important component in an overdose prevention strategy.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityBaltimoreDrug OverdoseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNaloxoneNaloxone

Identifiers

PMID31697736
PMCPMC6837378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.