Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31697712›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Negative impact of gestational diabetes mellitus on progress of pelvic floor muscle electromyography activity: Cohort study.

Caroline B Prudencio, Marilza V C Rudge, Fabiane A Pinheiro, Carlos I Sartorão Filho, Sthefanie K Nunes, Cristiane R Pedroni, Baerbel Junginger, Angélica M P Barbosa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Caroline B PrudencioDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2070-3606
Marilza V C RudgeDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fabiane A PinheiroDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Carlos I Sartorão FilhoDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Sthefanie K NunesDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Cristiane R PedroniDepartment of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, School of Philosophy and Sciences, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Marilia, São Paulo, Brazil.
Baerbel JungingerGynecology Department, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
Angélica M P BarbosaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivePelvic floor muscles are involved in postural stability, in maintenance intra-abdominal pressure, and on mechanical support for pelvic organ. Gestational Diabetes Mellitus' (GDM) pregnancies complicated by fetal macrosomia, large placenta and polyhydramnios contribute for abrupt and intense increase in maternal intra-abdominal pressure. Our objective was analyze the impact of GDM on pelvic floor muscle (PFM) electromyography (EMG) activity progress from 24-30 to 36-38 weeks of gestation. We conducted a prospective cohort study. PFM EMG was performed in nulliparous or primiparous women with one previous elective cesarean delivery and with or not GDM diagnosed by the American Diabetes Association criteria. A careful explanation of the muscle anatomy and functionality of the PFM was given before EMG assessment. The outcome measures were PFM recruitment and progress from 24-30 to 36-38 weeks of gestation analyzed by the normalized root mean square (RMS) during rest-activity, fast and hold pelvic floor muscle contraction.

resultsFifty-two pregnant women were assigned to 2 groups: the GDM (n = 26) and normoglycemic (NG) (n = 26). The demographic and obstetric data showed homogeneity between the groups. PFM activity progress was decreased in rest-activity (P = 0.042) and hold contraction (P = 0.044) at 36-38 weeks of gestation in the GDM group relative to that in the NG group.

conclusionGDM group showed a progressive decrease in EMG-PFM activity during rest-activity and hold contractions from 24-30 to 36-38 weeks of gestation.

Indexed as

AdultDiabetes, GestationalElectromyographyFemaleHumansMuscle ContractionMuscle, SkeletalPelvic FloorPregnancyPressureProspective StudiesRest

Identifiers

PMID31697712
PMCPMC6857854
OpenAlexW2983470523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.