Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31697698›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

A tailored cognitive behavioral program for juvenile justice-referred females at risk of substance use and delinquency: A pilot quasi-experimental trial.

Sarah C Walker, Mylien Duong, Christopher Hayes, Lucy Berliner, Leslie D Leve, David C Atkins, Jerald R Herting, Asia S Bishop, Esteban Valencia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Evidence Base Update of Psychosocial Treatments for Adolescents with Disruptive Behavior.Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53 · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sarah C WalkerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2298-7451
Mylien DuongDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Christopher HayesSnohomish County Juvenile Court, Everett, Washington, United States of America.
Lucy BerlinerHarborview Center for Sexual Assault and Trauma, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Leslie D LeveCollege of Education, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3061-4524
David C AtkinsDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Jerald R HertingDepartment of Sociology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Asia S BishopDepartment of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Esteban ValenciaDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.

Funding

A Girls-Specific Prevention Program for Substance Use and DelinquencyR21DA037455 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WALKER, SARAH CUSWORTH · 2015 to 2016
$351k
NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA037455
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This pilot quasi-experimental trial tested a gender-responsive cognitive behavioral group intervention with 87 court-involved female adolescents (5 juvenile courts) who were at indicated risk for substance use disorder. Participants in the intervention (n = 57) received twice weekly group sessions for 10 weeks (20 sessions) focused on building emotional, thought and behavior regulation skills and generalizing these skills to relationally-based scenarios (GOAL: Girls Only Active Learning). Youth in the control condition (n = 30) received services as usual, which included non-gender-specific aggression management training, individual counseling and no services. The GOAL program was found to be acceptable to youth and parents and feasible to implement within a juvenile court setting using skilled facilitators. Compared to services as usual, the program significantly and meaningfully reduced self-reported delinquent behavior (β = 0.84, p < 0.05) over 6 months, and exhibited trend level effects for reduced substance use (β = 0.40, p = 0.07). The program had mixed or no effects on family conflict and emotion regulation skills. These findings are discussed in light of treatment mechanisms and gender-responsive services.

Indexed as

AdolescentAntisocial Personality DisorderBehaviorChildCognitionEmotionsFamily ConflictFemaleHumansLearningPilot ProjectsSubstance-Related Disorders

Identifiers

PMID31697698
PMCPMC6837457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.