Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31697682›Full record

ReviewPLoS genetics2019

The joy of balancers.

Danny E Miller, Kevin R Cook, R Scott Hawley

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Differential elimination of marked sex chromosomes enables production of nontransgenic male mosquitoes in a single strain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. The deubiquitinase Usp7 inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. CRISPR/Cas9-based split homing gene drive targetingProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Where are all the egg genes?Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Mutations ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Danny E MillerDepartment of Medicine, Division of Medical Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6096-8601
Kevin R CookDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America.
R Scott HawleyStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, Missouri, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6478-0494
Indiana University Bloomington · USSeattle Children's Hospital · USStowers Institute for Medical Research · US

Funding

Resource Component: Acquisition, maintenance and distribution of Drosophila stocksP40OD018537 · OD · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI Annette L. Parks · 2014 to 2026
$13.5M
NIH HHS P40 OD018537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Balancer chromosomes are multiply inverted and rearranged chromosomes that are widely used in Drosophila genetics. First described nearly 100 years ago, balancers are used extensively in stock maintenance and complex crosses. Recently, the complete molecular structures of several commonly used balancers were determined by whole-genome sequencing. This revealed a surprising amount of variation among balancers derived from a common progenitor, identified genes directly affected by inversion breakpoints, and cataloged mutations shared by balancers. These studies emphasized that it is important to choose the optimal balancer, because different inversions suppress meiotic recombination in different chromosomal regions. In this review, we provide a brief history of balancers in Drosophila, discuss how they are used today, and provide examples of unexpected recombination events involving balancers that can lead to stock breakdown.

Indexed as

AnimalsCentromereChromosome InversionChromosomes, InsectDrosophila melanogasterGenome, InsectHeterochromatinHomologous RecombinationPhenotypeSequence DeletionX ChromosomeHeterochromatin

Identifiers

PMID31697682
PMCPMC6837283
OpenAlexW2986958864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.