ReviewRadiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc
Imaging of Merkel Cell Carcinoma: What Imaging Experts Should Know.
Review in Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Primary malignant melanoma of the female urethra: a case report and literature review.The Canadian journal of urology · 2026Review
- Ultrasound Assessment in Merkel Cell Carcinoma: Case Report and Narrative Literature Review.Reports (MDPI) · 2026Article
- Review
- Advances in Skin Ultrasonography for Malignant and Benign Tumors of the Head and Neck: Current Insights and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Unmasking hidden Merkel cell carcinoma recurrences: Three illustrative cases of patients with rising viral oncoprotein antibody levels and challenge of requiring multi-modal imaging to detect clinical disease.Radiology case reports · 2024Article
- Imaging of Merkel cell carcinoma of the eyelid: A case report.Oncology letters · 2024Article
- Merkel Cell Carcinoma of the Trunk: Two Case Reports and Imaging Review.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2023Article
- Management of Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer: Radiologists Challenging and Risk Assessment.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Management and Prognosis of Cardiac Metastatic Merkel Cell Carcinoma: A Case-Control Study and Literature Review.Cancers · 2022Article
- Nationwide multidisciplinary consensus on the clinical management of Merkel cell carcinoma: a Delphi panel.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2022Article
- Imaging findings of malignant skin tumors: radiological-pathological correlation.Insights into imaging · 2022Review
- Merkel Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Current State of Treatment and Future Directions.Cancers · 2021Review
- Positron Emission Tomography in Merkel Cell Carcinoma.Cancers · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive cutaneous neuroendocrine tumor with a higher mortality rate than melanoma. Approximately 40% of MCC patients have nodal or distant metastasis at initial presentation, and one-third of patients will develop distant metastatic disease over their clinical course. Although MCC is rare, its incidence has been steadily increasing. Furthermore, the immunogenicity of MCC and its diagnostic and therapeutic application have made MCC one of the most rapidly developing topics in dermatology and oncology. Owing to the aggressive and complex nature of MCC, a multidisciplinary approach is necessary for management of this tumor, including dermatologists, surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, and nuclear medicine physicians. Imaging plays a crucial role in diagnosis, planning for surgery or radiation therapy, and assessment of treatment response and surveillance. However, MCC is still not well recognized among radiologists and nuclear medicine physicians, likely owing to its rarity. The purpose of this review is to raise awareness of MCC among imaging experts by describing the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical features of MCC and current clinical management with a focus on the role of imaging. The authors highlight imaging findings characteristic of MCC, as well as the clinical significance of CT, MRI, sentinel lymph node mapping, fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT, and other nuclear medicine studies such as bone scintigraphy and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.