Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31697436›Full record

ArticleProteins2020

Enhanced sampling of protein conformational states for dynamic cross-docking within the protein-protein docking server SwarmDock.

Mieczyslaw Torchala, Tereza Gerguri, Raphael A G Chaleil, Patrick Gordon, Francis Russell, Miriam Keshani, Paul A Bates

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteins, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Advances to tackle backbone flexibility in protein docking.Current opinion in structural biology · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mieczyslaw TorchalaBiomolecular Modelling Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4542-9156
Tereza GerguriBiomolecular Modelling Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.
Raphael A G ChaleilBiomolecular Modelling Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2759-2088
Patrick GordonHadean Supercomputing Ltd, London, UK.
Francis RussellHadean Supercomputing Ltd, London, UK.
Miriam KeshaniHadean Supercomputing Ltd, London, UK.
Paul A BatesBiomolecular Modelling Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0621-0925
The Francis Crick Institute · GBPittsburgh Supercomputing Center · US

Funding

Cancer Research UK 10748Cancer Research UK FC001003Medical Research Council FC001003Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust FC001003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The formation of specific protein-protein interactions is often a key to a protein's function. During complex formation, each protein component will undergo a change in the conformational state, for some these changes are relatively small and reside primarily at the sidechain level; however, others may display notable backbone adjustments. One of the classic problems in the protein-docking field is to be able to a priori predict the extent of such conformational changes. In this work, we investigated three protocols to find the most suitable input structure conformations for cross-docking, including a robust sampling approach in normal mode space. Counterintuitively, knowledge of the theoretically best combination of normal modes for unbound-bound transitions does not always lead to the best results. We used a novel spatial partitioning library, Aether Engine (see Supplementary Materials), to efficiently search the conformational states of 56 receptor/ligand pairs, including a recent CAPRI target, in a systematic manner and selected diverse conformations as input to our automated docking server, SwarmDock, a server that allows moderate conformational adjustments during the docking process. In essence, here we present a dynamic cross-docking protocol, which when benchmarked against the simpler approach of just docking the unbound components shows a 10% uplift in the quality of the top docking pose.

Indexed as

Molecular Docking SimulationSoftwareAmino Acid SequenceBenchmarkingBinding SitesHumansLigandsProtein BindingProtein Conformation, alpha-HelicalProtein Conformation, beta-StrandProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsReceptors, Cell SurfaceResearch DesignStructural Homology, ProteinLigandsReceptors, Cell SurfaceAether EngineCAPRIconformational selectionconformational states space samplingcross-dockingDFIRE2induced fitnormal modesprotein-protein dockingprotein-protein interactionsSwarmDock

Identifiers

PMID31697436
PMCPMC7496321
OpenAlexW2982862182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.