Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31697362›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2019

Enabling semantic queries across federated bioinformatics databases.

Ana Claudia Sima, Tarcisio Mendes de Farias, Erich Zbinden, Maria Anisimova, Manuel Gil, Heinz Stockinger, Kurt Stockinger, Marc Robinson-Rechavi, Christophe Dessimoz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ana Claudia SimaZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Obere Kirchgasse 2, 8400 Winterthur Switzerland.
Tarcisio Mendes de FariasDepartment of Computational Biology, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Erich ZbindenZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Obere Kirchgasse 2, 8400 Winterthur Switzerland.
Maria AnisimovaZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Obere Kirchgasse 2, 8400 Winterthur Switzerland.
Manuel GilZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Obere Kirchgasse 2, 8400 Winterthur Switzerland.
Heinz StockingerSIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Kurt StockingerZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Obere Kirchgasse 2, 8400 Winterthur Switzerland.
Marc Robinson-RechaviSIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Christophe DessimozDepartment of Computational Biology, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationData integration promises to be one of the main catalysts in enabling new insights to be drawn from the wealth of biological data available publicly. However, the heterogeneity of the different data sources, both at the syntactic and the semantic level, still poses significant challenges for achieving interoperability among biological databases.

resultsWe introduce an ontology-based federated approach for data integration. We applied this approach to three heterogeneous data stores that span different areas of biological knowledge: (i) Bgee, a gene expression relational database; (ii) Orthologous Matrix (OMA), a Hierarchical Data Format 5 orthology DS; and (iii) UniProtKB, a Resource Description Framework (RDF) store containing protein sequence and functional information. To enable federated queries across these sources, we first defined a new semantic model for gene expression called GenEx. We then show how the relational data in Bgee can be expressed as a virtual RDF graph, instantiating GenEx, through dedicated relational-to-RDF mappings. By applying these mappings, Bgee data are now accessible through a public SPARQL endpoint. Similarly, the materialized RDF data of OMA, expressed in terms of the Orthology ontology, is made available in a public SPARQL endpoint. We identified and formally described intersection points (i.e. virtual links) among the three data sources. These allow performing joint queries across the data stores. Finally, we lay the groundwork to enable nontechnical users to benefit from the integrated data, by providing a natural language template-based search interface.

Indexed as

Biological OntologiesComputational BiologyDatabases, FactualSemantic Web

Identifiers

PMID31697362
PMCPMC6836710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.