Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31697321›Full record

GuidelineBriefings in bioinformatics2020

A beginner's guide for FMDV quasispecies analysis: sub-consensus variant detection and haplotype reconstruction using next-generation sequencing.

Marco Cacciabue, Anabella Currá, Elisa Carrillo, Guido König, María Inés Gismondi

Open access · bronzeAbstract readGuideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marco CacciabueInstituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular (IABiMo, INTA-CONICET), Hurlingham, Argentina.
Anabella CurráInstituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular (IABiMo, INTA-CONICET), Hurlingham, Argentina.
Elisa CarrilloInstituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular (IABiMo, INTA-CONICET), Hurlingham, Argentina.
Guido KönigInstituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular (IABiMo, INTA-CONICET), Hurlingham, Argentina.
María Inés GismondiInstituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular (IABiMo, INTA-CONICET), Hurlingham, Argentina.
Instituto de Agrobiotecnología del Litoral · ARNational University of Luján · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep sequencing of viral genomes is a powerful tool to study RNA virus complexity. However, the analysis of next-generation sequencing data might be challenging for researchers who have never approached the study of viral quasispecies by this methodology. In this work we present a suitable and affordable guide to explore the sub-consensus variability and to reconstruct viral quasispecies from Illumina sequencing data. The guide includes a complete analysis pipeline along with user-friendly descriptions of software and file formats. In addition, we assessed the feasibility of the workflow proposed by analyzing a set of foot-and-mouth disease viruses (FMDV) with different degrees of variability. This guide introduces the analysis of quasispecies of FMDV and other viruses through this kind of approach.

Indexed as

Foot-and-Mouth Disease VirusHaplotypesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingQuasispeciesAnimalsGenes, Viralanalysis workflowhaplotype reconstructionIllumina sequencing platformopen-source softwaresub-consensus SNVviral quasispecies

Identifiers

PMID31697321
PMCPMC7110011
OpenAlexW2987267640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.