Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31696576›Full record

ReviewGlobal change biology2020

How corals made rocks through the ages.

Jeana L Drake, Tali Mass, Jarosław Stolarski, Stanislas Von Euw, Bas van de Schootbrugge, Paul G Falkowski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global change biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Building like a Coral-Parallelized, Multiscale Biofabrication.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A noveliScience · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Role of the bicarbonate transporter SLC4γ in stony-coral skeleton formation and evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jeana L DrakeDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9851-379X
Tali MassDepartment of Marine Biology, The Leon H. Charney School of Marine Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-7298-290X
Jarosław StolarskiInstitute of Paleobiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0994-6823
Stanislas Von EuwTrinity Centre for Bioengineering, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-8954-962X
Bas van de SchootbruggeDepartment of Earth Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2270-6285
Paul G FalkowskiDepartment of Marine and Coastal Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2353-1969

Funding

European Commission 793861European Research Council 755876Israel Science Foundation 312/15National Science Centre (Poland) 2017/25/B/ST10/02221National Science Foundation (United States) 1611943National Science Foundation (United States) EF-1416785
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hard, or stony, corals make rocks that can, on geological time scales, lead to the formation of massive reefs in shallow tropical and subtropical seas. In both historical and contemporary oceans, reef-building corals retain information about the marine environment in their skeletons, which is an organic-inorganic composite material. The elemental and isotopic composition of their skeletons is frequently used to reconstruct the environmental history of Earth's oceans over time, including temperature, pH, and salinity. Interpretation of this information requires knowledge of how the organisms formed their skeletons. The basic mechanism of formation of calcium carbonate skeleton in stony corals has been studied for decades. While some researchers consider coral skeletons as mainly passive recorders of ocean conditions, it has become increasingly clear that biological processes play key roles in the biomineralization mechanism. Understanding the role of the animal in living stony coral biomineralization and how it evolved has profound implications for interpreting environmental signatures in fossil corals to understand past ocean conditions. Here we review historical hypotheses and discuss the present understanding of how corals evolved and how their skeletons changed over geological time. We specifically explain how biological processes, particularly those occurring at the subcellular level, critically control the formation of calcium carbonate structures. We examine the different models that address the current debate including the tissue-skeleton interface, skeletal organic matrix, and biomineralization pathways. Finally, we consider how understanding the biological control of coral biomineralization is critical to informing future models of coral vulnerability to inevitable global change, particularly increasing ocean acidification.

Indexed as

AnthozoaAnimalsCalcification, PhysiologicCalcium CarbonateCoral ReefsHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationOceans and SeasSeawaterCalcium Carbonateamorphous calcium carbonatearagonitebiomineralizationcalcitecalicoblastic cellscoralscrystal growthskeletal organic matrix

Identifiers

PMID31696576
PMCPMC6942544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.