ArticleDrugs - real world outcomes2019
Clinical Experience with Telavancin: Real-World Results from the Telavancin Observational Use Registry (TOUR™).
Article in Drugs - real world outcomes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- New-Generation Antibiotics for Treatment of Gram-Positive Infections: A Review with Focus on Endocarditis and Osteomyelitis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Clinical Experience with Telavancin for the Treatment of Patients with Bacteremia and Endocarditis: Real-World Results from the Telavancin Observational Use Registry (TOUR™).Drugs - real world outcomes · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTelavancin-a lipoglycopeptide antibacterial agent active against Gram-positive pathogens including methicillin-sensitive and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)-is approved in the USA for once-daily intravenous use. This registry study captured patient characteristics, prescribing patterns, and treatment outcomes associated with telavancin use in real-world clinical practice.
objectiveThis prospective, multicenter, observational study will characterize current real-world practice patterns for the use of telavancin in the USA by describing demographic and clinical conditions, examining the process of care and rationale for use, and describing the clinical effectiveness and selected safety outcomes among patients treated with telavancin.
methodsThe Telavancin Observational Use Registry (TOUR™) is an observational multicenter registry study. Clinical data-including patient demographics, pathogens, telavancin dosing and treatment duration, and adverse events-along with investigators' assessments of outcome, were collected through retrospective medical chart review.
resultsData from 1063 patients were collected from 45 US sites. Of these patients, 29.4% were ≥ 65 years of age [mean age ± standard deviation, 55.2 ± 15.4 years; median age (interquartile range), 57.0 (46.0-66.0)], 53.4% were male, and 83.4% were White. The primary infections in these patients included complicated skin and skin-structure infection (48.7%), bone and joint infections (27.4%), bacteremia and endocarditis (14.2%), and lower respiratory tract infections (8.5%). The predominant pathogen identified was MRSA (37.7%). The mean telavancin dose and duration of treatment were 741.7 ± 194.3 mg and 17 ± 17 days, respectively. Of the 964 (90.7%) patients for whom an end-of-treatment assessment was available, 77.7% had a positive clinical response, 10.1% failed treatment, and 12.2% had indeterminate outcomes.
conclusionsReal-world data collected from the TOUR study show once-daily telavancin is being used for the treatment of a variety of Gram-positive infections with generally positive clinical outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.